Btrfs devel - Nov 2010 - tiny btrfs bug.....

Hi there.

I''m running my root on a raid1 btrfs partition stretching over two
partitions on two separate disks.

Each partition is 30GB, so I would expect the raid to be 30GB big,
being a mirror and all.

In stead, df reports the size of the partition to be about 60GB. For
each GB written to the partition, 2GB gets used.

Is this intentional?

I''m running kernel 2.6.36

-Evert-

-- 
http://magnatune.com - Music shared the way it should be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hi,

   > In stead, df reports the size of the partition to be about
   > 60GB. For each GB written to the partition, 2GB gets used.

https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_does_df_show_incorrect_free_space_for_my_RAID_volume.3F

-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html