Li Dongyang
2009-Nov-06 14:33 UTC
[PATCH]don''t call btrfs_release_path in btrfs_update_root and btrfs_del_root
We don''t need to call btrfs_release_path because btrfs_free_path will do that for us. Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <Jerry87905@gmail.com> --- fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c index 9351428..67fa2d2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c @@ -159,7 +159,6 @@ int btrfs_update_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root write_extent_buffer(l, item, ptr, sizeof(*item)); btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(path->nodes[0]); out: - btrfs_release_path(root, path); btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; } @@ -332,7 +331,6 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, BUG_ON(refs != 0); ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path); out: - btrfs_release_path(root, path); btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html