Jean-Christophe Michel
2008-Jul-15 17:15 UTC
[Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ?
Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : ? keep svn ? migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/4e9a2b4b/attachment.html>
Hey Jean-Christophe, I prefer git. Also, I think it''d be worth it to try to sync up with Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have "One True Nested Set". On 7/15/08 11:15 AM, "Jean-Christophe Michel" <jc.michel at symetrie.com> wrote: Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : - keep svn - migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/78f92b23/attachment.html>
You can use git with an svn backend. The two can be joined happily together. =) Zach On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Jean-Christophe Michel < jc.michel at symetrie.com> wrote:> Hi, > > > On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. > What do you prefer : > > ? keep svn > ? migrate to git > > Thansk ! > > Jean-Christophe Michel > -- > symetrie.com > > Better Nested Set for rails: > http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set > > > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > >-- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/458c5efd/attachment-0001.html>
Jean-Christophe Michel
2008-Jul-15 17:51 UTC
[Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ?
Hi, Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit :> Hey Jean-Christophe, > > I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with > Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One > True Nested Set?.True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ tree ? Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/5be2280c/attachment.html>
+1 vote for simply calling it "nested_set" -- the "acts_as" is becoming superfluous. :) Kevin Jean-Christophe Michel wrote:> Hi, > > Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit : > >> Hey Jean-Christophe, >> >> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One True >> Nested Set?. > > True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/tree ? > > > Jean-Christophe Michel > -- > symetrie.com > > Better Nested Set for rails: > http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
Git-svn workflow is different enough from git that in a team setting it''s just a little sugar on svn. A vote for git is a vote for a different workflow entirely... On 7/15/08 11:31 AM, "Zach Dennis" <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote: You can use git with an svn backend. The two can be joined happily together. =) Zach On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Jean-Christophe Michel <jc.michel at symetrie.com> wrote: Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : - keep svn - migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com <http://symetrie.com><http://symetrie.com> Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set _______________________________________________ Betternestedset-talk mailing list Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/0376c3bf/attachment.html>
> >I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with > >Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One > >True Nested Set?. > > True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ > tree ?Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git.
Cynthia Kiser wrote:>>> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >>> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >>> True Nested Set?. >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ >> tree ? > > Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git.+1 for git. It would be nice to recreate the full git history to include acts_as_nested_set and awesome_nested_set (and get awesome_nested_set to graft onto that history) but it could be a lot of work to do so. -Tim> _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
Christopher Bailey
2008-Jul-15 19:20 UTC
[Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ?
I''d vote not only for Git, but for GitHub. On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Cynthia Kiser <cnk at caltech.edu> wrote:>> >I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >> >Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >> >True Nested Set?. >> >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ >> tree ? > > Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git. > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk >-- Christopher Bailey Cobalt Edge LLC http://cobaltedge.com
Github has been a great experience for me, both for hosting plugins and collaborating on others. Kevin Triplett wrote:> +1 vote for simply calling it "nested_set" -- the "acts_as" is becoming > superfluous. :) > > Kevin > > > Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit : >> >>> Hey Jean-Christophe, >>> >>> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >>> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >>> True Nested Set?. >> >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/tree ? >> >> >> Jean-Christophe Michel >> -- >> symetrie.com >> >> Better Nested Set for rails: >> http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Betternestedset-talk mailing list >> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk >