Betternestedset talk - Jul 2008 - Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1

I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but
failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the
patch, but that obviously didn''t make it. I apologize for being dumb.
Here''s the patch one more time. Apply the patch to
betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb.

Just to let you all know, I''ve switched from Better Nested Set to
Awesome Nested Set, and it''s been a pretty much drop in replacement.
The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully
removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of.

Here''s the repo for awesome nested set:
http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master

I don''t mean to start any conflict about which project you should be
using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer
maintained.

Thanks,
Tony Hillerson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: better_nested_set.rb.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1681 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080708/2ca4555f/attachment-0001.obj>

Excellent! I was waiting for a nested set plugin to be 
hosted at github. Thanks! I''ll try to submit a patch for my 
move_to_tree_of method there in the next two weeks, if 
everything looks good with ANS.

Tony Hillerson wrote:
> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but
> failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the
> patch, but that obviously didn''t make it. I apologize for being
dumb.
> Here''s the patch one more time. Apply the patch to
> betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb.
> 
> Just to let you all know, I''ve switched from Better Nested Set to
> Awesome Nested Set, and it''s been a pretty much drop in
replacement.
> The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully
> removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of.
> 
> Here''s the repo for awesome nested set:
> http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master
> 
> I don''t mean to start any conflict about which project you should
be
> using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer
> maintained.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tony Hillerson
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk

Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS?  I''ve been
looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I
have, but destroy''s don''t seem to proplery destroy all
descendants.
For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia, and it
has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San Francisco". 
When I
delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities.

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson <tony.hillerson at
gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but
> failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the
> patch, but that obviously didn''t make it. I apologize for being
dumb.
> Here''s the patch one more time. Apply the patch to
> betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb.
>
> Just to let you all know, I''ve switched from Better Nested Set to
> Awesome Nested Set, and it''s been a pretty much drop in
replacement.
> The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully
> removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of.
>
> Here''s the repo for awesome nested set:
> http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master
>
> I don''t mean to start any conflict about which project you should
be
> using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer
> maintained.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony Hillerson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
>
>


-- 
Christopher Bailey
Cobalt Edge LLC
http://cobaltedge.com

We did some tests on that and it seems that destroying the root destroys all the
children.


On 7/15/08 2:36 AM, "Christopher Bailey" <chris at
cobaltedge.com> wrote:

Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS?  I''ve been
looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I
have, but destroy''s don''t seem to proplery destroy all
descendants.
For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia, and it
has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San Francisco". 
When I
delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities.

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson <tony.hillerson at
gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but
> failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the
> patch, but that obviously didn''t make it. I apologize for being
dumb.
> Here''s the patch one more time. Apply the patch to
> betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb.
>
> Just to let you all know, I''ve switched from Better Nested Set to
> Awesome Nested Set, and it''s been a pretty much drop in
replacement.
> The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully
> removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of.
>
> Here''s the repo for awesome nested set:
> http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master
>
> I don''t mean to start any conflict about which project you should
be
> using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer
> maintained.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony Hillerson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
>
>


--
Christopher Bailey
Cobalt Edge LLC
http://cobaltedge.com
_______________________________________________
Betternestedset-talk mailing list
Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/betternestedset-talk/attachments/20080715/d6bf1e7f/attachment.html>

I''m still having issues.  But, after applying your Rails 2.1 patch to
BNS, I''m good to go there.  For anyone interested, I have Better
Nested Set on GitHub, with this patch applied:

http://github.com/chris/better_nested_set/tree/master

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Tony Hillerson
<Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com> wrote:
> We did some tests on that and it seems that destroying the root destroys
all
> the children.
>
>
> On 7/15/08 2:36 AM, "Christopher Bailey" <chris at
cobaltedge.com> wrote:
>
> Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS?  I''ve
been
> looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I
> have, but destroy''s don''t seem to proplery destroy all
descendants.
> For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia,
and it
> has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San
Francisco".  When I
> delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities.
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson <tony.hillerson at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but
>> failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the
>> patch, but that obviously didn''t make it. I apologize for
being dumb.
>> Here''s the patch one more time. Apply the patch to
>> betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb.
>>
>> Just to let you all know, I''ve switched from Better Nested Set
to
>> Awesome Nested Set, and it''s been a pretty much drop in
replacement.
>> The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully
>> removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of.
>>
>> Here''s the repo for awesome nested set:
>> http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master
>>
>> I don''t mean to start any conflict about which project you
should be
>> using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer
>> maintained.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tony Hillerson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
>> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christopher Bailey
> Cobalt Edge LLC
> http://cobaltedge.com
> _______________________________________________
> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Betternestedset-talk mailing list
> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk
>
>


-- 
Christopher Bailey
Cobalt Edge LLC
http://cobaltedge.com

Hi,


Le 15 juil. 08 ? 18:04, Christopher Bailey a ?crit :
> I''m still having issues.  But, after applying your Rails 2.1 patch
to
> BNS, I''m good to go there.  For anyone interested, I have Better
> Nested Set on GitHub, with this patch applied:
>
> http://github.com/chris/better_nested_set/tree/master
Thanks. I''ll ask everybody to decide wether to migrate rubyforge to
git.

Jean-Christophe Michel
--
symetrie.com

Better Nested Set for rails:
http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set