Benoit Panizzon
2017-Nov-21 11:04 UTC
[asterisk-users] How to correctly set REDIRECTING to indicate diversion reason
Hi Richard Thank you> You need to set more redirecting information [1]. > > In sip.conf send_diversion=yes needs to be in effect. You also need > to setup > the from party id information (at least the from number) to indicate > where you > are redirecting from. You should also increment the redirecting > count. > > Richard > > [1] > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Manipulating+Party+ID+InformationI'm back to chan_sip to get quicker progress in our test scenario as I know this better than pjsip :-) send_diversion=yes is the default if it is not set, so that's correctly set. I altered my test dialplan and got some success but also another weird problem now: exten => XX,1,NoOp(Call to ${EXTEN} from ${CALLERID(all)}) exten => XX,n,Progress exten => XX,n,Ringing exten => XX,n,Wait(10) exten => XX,n,set(REDIRECTING(from-num)=${EXTEN}) exten => XX,n,set(REDIRECTING(reason)=cfnr) exten => XX,n,Transfer(SIP/ZZ) How everytime REDIRECTING is called, this causes a 181 call is being forwarded to the caller, but containing no diversion information. The Transfer (302 Moved Temporarily) contains two Diversion: headers, one with reason=unknown and one with reason=no-answer which would be the correct one. I start to think I stumbled over a bug. Maybe using REDIRECTING() would set the correct headers if I used DIAL to forward the call. But I don't want to create a second call leg. So maybe Transfer already is setting a Diversion: header with hardcoded reason 'unknown'. -Beno?t Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________
Richard Mudgett
2017-Nov-21 14:10 UTC
[asterisk-users] How to correctly set REDIRECTING to indicate diversion reason
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon at imp.ch> wrote:> Hi Richard > > Thank you > > > You need to set more redirecting information [1]. > > > > In sip.conf send_diversion=yes needs to be in effect. You also need > > to setup > > the from party id information (at least the from number) to indicate > > where you > > are redirecting from. You should also increment the redirecting > > count. > > > > Richard > > > > [1] > > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Manipulating+ > Party+ID+Information > > I'm back to chan_sip to get quicker progress in our test scenario as I > know this better than pjsip :-) > > send_diversion=yes is the default if it is not set, so that's correctly > set. > > I altered my test dialplan and got some success but also another weird > problem now: > > exten => XX,1,NoOp(Call to ${EXTEN} from ${CALLERID(all)}) > exten => XX,n,Progress > exten => XX,n,Ringing > exten => XX,n,Wait(10) > exten => XX,n,set(REDIRECTING(from-num)=${EXTEN}) >You need to use the 'i' option of REDIRECTING here as described in the manipulating party id wiki page.> exten => XX,n,set(REDIRECTING(reason)=cfnr) > exten => XX,n,Transfer(SIP/ZZ) > > How everytime REDIRECTING is called, this causes a 181 call is being > forwarded to the caller, but containing no diversion information. > > The Transfer (302 Moved Temporarily) contains two Diversion: headers, > one with reason=unknown and one with reason=no-answer which would be the > correct one. > > I start to think I stumbled over a bug. Maybe using REDIRECTING() would > set the correct headers if I used DIAL to forward the call. But I don't > want to create a second call leg. So maybe Transfer already is setting > a Diversion: header with hardcoded reason 'unknown'. >That could be possible and would be a bug in chan_sip. Richard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171121/6ccfad7e/attachment.html>
Benoit Panizzon
2017-Nov-27 09:32 UTC
[asterisk-users] pjsip Transfer 'Failed to parse destination uri'
Hi Richard> That could be possible and would be a bug in chan_sip.Ok, so I switched to PJSIP to see if this behaves differently So ip do a Transfer(PJSIP/${DESTNUMBER}@trunk) And this results in: Failed to parse destination URI '[destnumber scrubber]' for channel PJSIP/trunk-00000011 Do I have to specify the destination number differently when using Transfer with pjsip that I used it in chan_sip? -Beno?t Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________
Seemingly Similar Threads
- How to correctly set REDIRECTING to indicate diversion reason
- pjsip rtp_ipv6=yes but endpoint registered via ipv4 (IP4 contact infor)
- PJSIP: identify endpoint by authentication username?
- Weird 'hairpin' call rtp audio problem
- How to correctly set REDIRECTING to indicate diversion reason