Steve Edwards
2015-Apr-13 18:15 UTC
[asterisk-users] meetme vs confbridge max user comparison wanted
I've got some Asterisk 11 (I could 'upgrade' if needed) hosts using meetme and I'd like to switch to confbridge to service more callers. Can anyone reply with their experience along the lines of 'using meetme I was only getting x callers per server but with confbridge I now get y callers per server?' -- Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Edwards sedwards at sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000
Matthew Jordan
2015-Apr-14 12:40 UTC
[asterisk-users] meetme vs confbridge max user comparison wanted
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Steve Edwards <asterisk.org at sedwards.com> wrote:> I've got some Asterisk 11 (I could 'upgrade' if needed) hosts using meetme > and I'd like to switch to confbridge to service more callers. > > Can anyone reply with their experience along the lines of 'using meetme I > was only getting x callers per server but with confbridge I now get y > callers per server?' >Anecdotally, when ConfBridge was first rewritten in Asterisk 10, some performance comparisons with MeetMe were performed. In the best case, on a particular system with conference user usage patterns, we saw MeetMe hit a limit at around 60 channels, and ConfBridge reach over 240 channels. Worst case for ConfBridge was around 140 channels. Note that the ConfBridge sample rate, mixing interval, and other parameters can greatly affect how far it scales out. -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | Director of Technology 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org