asterisk users - Oct 2012 - Queries regarding FastAGI

Hi

Recommendation about AGI scripts says that AGI script should terminate 
as early as possible. Is this recommendation applicable for FastAGI?
Is it necessary to keep waiting for result in FastAGI and then close 
FastAGI session? If not, what will be the impact on Asterisk resources 
when FastAGI session is closed immediately after giving command to Asterisk?
What will be the impact on Asterisk resources if we make 200 
simultaneous FastAGI calls? Any recommendations? FastAGI server will be 
running on different server.

Can we use Async AGI and AMI interface to execute AGI commands? AGI 
commands will be passed by AMI session.

Regards,
Amit Patkar

Hi

Its surprising that  no one is responded. Does this mean, that nobody 
has ever used FastAGI and AsyncAGI?
Does that also mean, that FastAGI & AsyncAGI should not be used?
I am using Asterisk 1.8.xx

Thanks & Regards,
Amit Patkar

On 10/8/2012 11:26 AM, Amit Patkar | ATPL wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recommendation about AGI scripts says that AGI script should terminate 
> as early as possible. Is this recommendation applicable for FastAGI?
> Is it necessary to keep waiting for result in FastAGI and then close 
> FastAGI session? If not, what will be the impact on Asterisk resources 
> when FastAGI session is closed immediately after giving command to 
> Asterisk?
> What will be the impact on Asterisk resources if we make 200 
> simultaneous FastAGI calls? Any recommendations? FastAGI server will 
> be running on different server.
>
> Can we use Async AGI and AMI interface to execute AGI commands? AGI 
> commands will be passed by AMI session.
>
> Regards,
> Amit Patkar

Hi Amit,

you can get better idea after reading this.

http://www.asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/AGI-variants.html

Also as per reading and my experience fastagi is better than agi, but
everything is depends on nature of application.

Hope this helpful.

Best Regards
Dhaval

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Amit Patkar | ATPL <amit at avhan.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Its surprising that  no one is responded. Does this mean, that nobody has
> ever used FastAGI and AsyncAGI?
> Does that also mean, that FastAGI & AsyncAGI should not be used?
> I am using Asterisk 1.8.xx
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amit Patkar
>
>
> On 10/8/2012 11:26 AM, Amit Patkar | ATPL wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Recommendation about AGI scripts says that AGI script should terminate
as
>> early as possible. Is this recommendation applicable for FastAGI?
>> Is it necessary to keep waiting for result in FastAGI and then close
>> FastAGI session? If not, what will be the impact on Asterisk resources
when
>> FastAGI session is closed immediately after giving command to Asterisk?
>> What will be the impact on Asterisk resources if we make 200
simultaneous
>> FastAGI calls? Any recommendations? FastAGI server will be running on
>> different server.
>>
>> Can we use Async AGI and AMI interface to execute AGI commands? AGI
>> commands will be passed by AMI session.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Amit Patkar
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  
http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**users<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20121010/f5ed5377/attachment-0001.htm>