Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call parking working correctly?
I've had several attempts at it, and never seem to be able to get it to go
properly - (actually, at all):
I've most recently done this with 1.6.1.x, and now 1.6.2.x, with no luck in
either case. What I've been "trying" is the following:
features.conf
[general]
parkext => 100
[featuremap]
[applicationmap]
[parkinglog_customer1-park]
parkext => 100
parkpos => 101-199
findslot => next
context => customer1-park
[parkinglog_customer2-park]
parkext => 100
parkpos => 101-199
findslot => next
context => customer2-park
extensions.conf
[customer1-call-park]
exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking place a call into the
parking lot...)
exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer1-park)
exten =>
_X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN}@customer1-callback)
exten => _X.,4,Hangup()
[customer2-call-park]
exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking place a call into the
parking lot...)
exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer2-park)
exten =>
_X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN}@customer2-callback)
exten => _X.,4,Hangup()
Calls are passed to the contexts in extensions by the number of the user trying
to place the call on park. The calls park fine, can be retrieved fine, and the
callbacks work fine (via the "customerX-callback") contexts which are
not shown here.
However, it simply does not seem to be putting calls into the parking lots
defined for each customer. It seems to place them all into the default parking
lot regardless of the lot you are trying to put them into. I see a lot of
people having similar issues, and I see some people claiming to have overcome
it, but no actual examples of how it was "overcome".
Love anyone's input here! I'm already thinning on top - don't want
to lose any more hair on this one!
Michael Wyres
Technical Specialist
Communications Design & Management
Level 1 / 99 King St
Melbourne Victoria 3000
P + 61 3 9601 6600
F + 61 3 9601 6601
mwyres at cdm.com.au<blocked::mailto:sbrophy at cdm.com.au>
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CA93A6.2B669DC0]
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT
Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any
attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as Communications
Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept any liability for loss
or damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments.
Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for the named
recipient only and may contain personal information, be it confidential or
subject to privilege, none of which are lost or waived because this email may
have been sent to you in error. If you are not the named addressee please let
CDM know by return email, permanently delete it from your system and destroy all
copies and do not use or disclose the contents.
Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it maybe
reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the copyright owner.
Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal information in
this email must be dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy
Act 1988.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100112/de33c880/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2785 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100112/de33c880/attachment.jpg
At 23:57 1/11/2010, Michael Wyres wrote:>Content-Language: en-US >Content-Type: multipart/related; > >boundary="_004_11FDCFCDD2B4B0439630AEC725D1635D1BAC56FDC4ssyd10exinter_"; > type="multipart/alternative" > >Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call >parking working correctly? I?ve had several >attempts at it, and never seem to be able to get >it to go properly ? (actually, at all): > >I?ve most recently done this with 1.6.1.x, and >now 1.6.2.x, with no luck in either case. What >I?ve been ?trying? is the following: > >features.conf > >[general] >parkext => 100 > >[featuremap] > >[applicationmap] > >[parkinglog_customer1-park] >parkext => 100 >parkpos => 101-199 >findslot => next >context => customer1-park > >[parkinglog_customer2-park] >parkext => 100 >parkpos => 101-199 >findslot => next >context => customer2-park > > > >extensions.conf > >[customer1-call-park] >exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking >place a call into the parking lot)>exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer1-park) >exten => >_X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN}@customer1-callback) >exten => _X.,4,Hangup() > >[customer2-call-park] >exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking >place a call into the parking lot)>exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer2-park) >exten => >_X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN}@customer2-callback) >exten => _X.,4,Hangup() > > >Calls are passed to the contexts in extensions >by the number of the user trying to place the >call on park. The calls park fine, can be >retrieved fine, and the callbacks work fine (via >the ?customerX-callback?) contexts which are not shown here. > >However, it simply does not seem to be putting >calls into the parking lots defined for each >customer. It seems to place them all into the >default parking lot regardless of the lot you >are trying to put them into. I see a lot of >people having similar issues, and I see some >people claiming to have overcome it, but no >actual examples of how it was ?overcome?. > >Love anyone?s input here! I?m already thinning >on top ? don?t want to lose any more hair on this one!Have you looked at this? http://www.google.com/#q=app_valetparking> > >Michael Wyres >Technical Specialist > >Communications Design & Management >Level 1 / 99 King St >Melbourne Victoria 3000 >P + 61 3 9601 6600 >F + 61 3 9601 6601 ><blocked::mailto:sbrophy at cdm.com.au>mwyres at cdm.com.au > >cid:image001.jpg at 01CA1A98.C7E957F0 > > > >IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT > >Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to >scan this email and any attachments for viruses >and defects and rely on those scans as >Communications Design & Management Pty Limited >(CDM) does not accept any liability for loss or >damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments. > >Confidentiality - This email and any attachments >are intended for the named recipient only and >may contain personal information, be it >confidential or subject to privilege, none of >which are lost or waived because this email may >have been sent to you in error. If you are not >the named addressee please let CDM know by >return email, permanently delete it from your >system and destroy all copies and do not use or disclose the contents. > >Copyright - This email is subject to copyright >and no part of it maybe reproduced in any manner >without the written permission of the copyright owner. > >Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian >law, personal information in this email must be >dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988. > > >-- >_____________________________________________________________________ >-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > >asterisk-users mailing list >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1b794ca8.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2785 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100112/5ac93ffc/attachment.jpg
Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf? --------------------------------------------- Sent from Zimbra and my iPhone! SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration On 12 Jan 2010, at 06:03, Michael Wyres <mwyres at cdm.com.au> wrote:> Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call parking working > correctly? I?ve had several attempts at it, and never seem to be ab > le to get it to go properly ? (actually, at all): > > > > I?ve most recently done this with 1.6.1.x, and now 1.6.2.x, with no > luck in either case. What I?ve been ?trying? is the following: > > > > features.conf > > > > [general] > > parkext => 100 > > > > [featuremap] > > > > [applicationmap] > > > > [parkinglog_customer1-park] > > parkext => 100 > > parkpos => 101-199 > > findslot => next > > context => customer1-park > > > > [parkinglog_customer2-park] > > parkext => 100 > > parkpos => 101-199 > > findslot => next > > context => customer2-park > > > > > > > > extensions.conf > > > > [customer1-call-park] > > exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking place a call into > the parking lot?) > > exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer1-park) > > exten => _X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN} > @customer1-callback) > > exten => _X.,4,Hangup() > > > > [customer2-call-park] > > exten => _X.,1,NoOp(The user ${EXTEN} is seeking place a call into > the parking lot?) > > exten => _X.,2,Set(PARKINGLOT=customer2-park) > > exten => _X.,3,ParkAndAnnounce(PARKED:call-waiting,60,Local/${EXTEN} > @customer2-callback) > > exten => _X.,4,Hangup() > > > > > > Calls are passed to the contexts in extensions by the number of the > user trying to place the call on park. The calls park fine, can be > retrieved fine, and the callbacks work fine (via the ?customerX-call > back?) contexts which are not shown here. > > > > However, it simply does not seem to be putting calls into the > parking lots defined for each customer. It seems to place them all > into the default parking lot regardless of the lot you are trying to > put them into. I see a lot of people having similar issues, and I > see some people claiming to have overcome it, but no actual examples > of how it was ?overcome?. > > > > Love anyone?s input here! I?m already thinning on top ? > don?t want to lose any more hair on this one! > > > > > > Michael Wyres > > Technical Specialist > > > > Communications Design & Management > > Level 1 / 99 King St > > Melbourne Victoria 3000 > > P + 61 3 9601 6600 > > F + 61 3 9601 6601 > > mwyres at cdm.com.au > > > > <image001.jpg> > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT > > Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and > any attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as > Communications Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept > any liability for loss or damage arising from receipt or use of this > email or any attachments. > > Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for > the named recipient only and may contain personal information, be it > confidential or subject to privilege, none of which are lost or > waived because this email may have been sent to you in error. If you > are not the named addressee please let CDM know by return email, > permanently delete it from your system and destroy all copies and do > not use or disclose the contents. > > Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it > maybe reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the > copyright owner. > > Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal > information in this email must be dealt with in compliance with the > Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988. > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100112/0c7445bb/attachment.htm
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of UxBoD Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:16 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant Parking Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf? It should ? but that?s not a cut and paste, as the asterisk setup is on a separate, non-connected network, and I just retyped it out ? not cut/paste. It?s spelt correctly in the real system (typo on here!) IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as Communications Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept any liability for loss or damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments. Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and may contain personal information, be it confidential or subject to privilege, none of which are lost or waived because this email may have been sent to you in error. If you are not the named addressee please let CDM know by return email, permanently delete it from your system and destroy all copies and do not use or disclose the contents. Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it maybe reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the copyright owner. Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal information in this email must be dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100113/770b309e/attachment.htm
>Have you looked at this? > http://www.google.com/#q=app_valetparkingI have - but would rather use the inbuilt functionality if possible before resorting to third-party code... IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as Communications Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept any liability for loss or damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments. Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and may contain personal information, be it confidential or subject to privilege, none of which are lost or waived because this email may have been sent to you in error. If you are not the named addressee please let CDM know by return email, permanently delete it from your system and destroy all copies and do not use or disclose the contents. Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it maybe reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the copyright owner. Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal information in this email must be dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988.
I have found that this seems to be a functional difference between the Park() and the ParkAndAnnounce() functions. Park() respects the parking lot specification, yet ParkAndAnnounce() does not respect the fact that you?ve tried to arbitrarily set the parking lot. The code below ?works? as designed when the Park() function is used instead. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of UxBoD Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:16 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant Parking Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf? It should ? but that?s not a cut and paste, as the asterisk setup is on a separate, non-connected network, and I just retyped it out ? not cut/paste. It?s spelt correctly in the real system (typo on here!) IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as Communications Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept any liability for loss or damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments. Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and may contain personal information, be it confidential or subject to privilege, none of which are lost or waived because this email may have been sent to you in error. If you are not the named addressee please let CDM know by return email, permanently delete it from your system and destroy all copies and do not use or disclose the contents. Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it maybe reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the copyright owner. Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal information in this email must be dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988. IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and defects and rely on those scans as Communications Design & Management Pty Limited (CDM) does not accept any liability for loss or damage arising from receipt or use of this email or any attachments. Confidentiality - This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and may contain personal information, be it confidential or subject to privilege, none of which are lost or waived because this email may have been sent to you in error. If you are not the named addressee please let CDM know by return email, permanently delete it from your system and destroy all copies and do not use or disclose the contents. Copyright - This email is subject to copyright and no part of it maybe reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the copyright owner. Privacy - Within the jurisdiction of Australian law, personal information in this email must be dealt with in compliance with the Australian Federal Privacy Act 1988. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100113/5189fb92/attachment.htm