Hi, Quick question to the real world. Approx what specs would I need on server to handle 95 ZAP or Dahdi -> SIP gateway using G729 on the SIP to carrier side (nothing else, just media conversion)? Does the latest Asterisk/DAHDI significantly improve these numbers over say, Asterisk 1.2.X? Sure, there is plenty to read but nothing I could find quickly on my exact needs that was clear and I want to be fairly sure before ordering a server. Obviously load avg has something to do with it but CPU and mem seems to be the biggest factors. -- Thanks, Steve Totaro +18887771888 (Toll Free) +12409381212 (Cell) +12024369784 (Skype) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090617/c4280a82/attachment.htm
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Steve Totaro wrote:> Hi, > > Quick question to the real world. > > Approx what specs would I need on server to handle 95 ZAP or Dahdi -> SIP > gateway using G729 on the SIP to carrier side (nothing else, just media > conversion)? > > Does the latest Asterisk/DAHDI significantly improve these numbers over say, > Asterisk 1.2.X? > > Sure, there is plenty to read but nothing I could find quickly on my exact > needs that was clear and I want to be fairly sure before ordering a server. > > Obviously load avg has something to do with it but CPU and mem seems to be > the biggest factors.Transcoding - It's CPU grunt and multi processors what you need (more so than memory) - handling that many calls ought to be a breeze on any modern hardware without the transcoding. Personally, I think I'd be looking at a TC400B card which can handle 96 concurrent g729 transcodes... But as a rough benchmark, I can do 12 concurrent g729 transcodes on a 1GHz VIA processor before it's totally maxed out, (stupid) extrapolation to 96 would suggest 8 x 1GHz processors, 4 x 2GHz, or 3 x 3GHz processors... However you gain more with the faster processors in terms of bigger cache (but that can also be a loss too) I'd start with a quad core system and see how it goes under benchmark... Gordon
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Steve Totaro wrote:> Hi, > > Quick question to the real world. > > Approx what specs would I need on server to handle 95 ZAP or Dahdi - > > SIP gateway using G729 on the SIP to carrier side (nothing else, > just media conversion)? > > Does the latest Asterisk/DAHDI significantly improve these numbers > over say, Asterisk 1.2.X? > > Sure, there is plenty to read but nothing I could find quickly on my > exact needs that was clear and I want to be fairly sure before > ordering a server. > > Obviously load avg has something to do with it but CPU and mem seems > to be the biggest factors. > > -- > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > +18887771888 (Toll Free) > +12409381212 (Cell) > +12024369784 (Skype)[Digium hat off, ITSP (previous employer) hat on.] Not speaking for Digium on this one, but speaking from personal experience at another company. We could get 100 G.729 channels in a 2x3ghz P4 machine with plenty of CPU room to spare, 4+ years ago, and that rule of thumb served us well. This was for SIP (G.711<->G.729) but I can't imagine that DAHDI or Asterisk takes significantly more or less horsepower for this task now for the base transcoding load. JT --- John Todd email:jtodd at digium.com Digium, Inc. | Asterisk Open Source Community Director 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville AL 35806 - USA direct: +1-256-428-6083 http://www.digium.com/
Seemingly Similar Threads
- CLI file convert from alaw to g729 with TC400B transcoding card results to an empty file
- *Sort of Commercial* TracFone's $45 unlimited offer to 'stun' rivals
- Asterisk and Digium TC400B
- autodialed call forwarding via meetme or queue (was predictive dialer)
- Asterisk help please