Hi All, I'm running Asterisk 1.4.22.1 on a CentOS 5 machine fitted with a TDM400P. When I upgraded from Asterisk 1.2.12.1, Zap stopped working. Doing "zap show channels" etc from the Asterisk CLI results in an error saying there's no such command. The machine has Zaptel 1.2.9.1, which I've tried to repair with make clean, make linux26, then make install but to no avail so I thought it's time to bite the bullet and move to DAHDI. After installing DAHDI 2.1.0.3 I get an error saying that the hardware is already in use. I've tried to uninstall Zaptel as follows: - running /etc/init.d/zaptel stop - running /bin/modprobe -r zaptel - running make clean from the zaptel installation directory However, on rebooting Zap still loads, which causes DAHDI to throw an error. I'm currently downloading the latest version of CentOS with a view to rebuilding this machine to use DAHDI from the start if I can't sort this out - but I'd rather fix what I've got if possible. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, -- Geoff
Have you tried recompiling/installing the new zaptel source before Asterisk? Geoff Lane wrote:> Hi All, > > I'm running Asterisk 1.4.22.1 on a CentOS 5 machine fitted with a > TDM400P. When I upgraded from Asterisk 1.2.12.1, Zap stopped working. > Doing "zap show channels" etc from the Asterisk CLI results in an > error saying there's no such command. > > The machine has Zaptel 1.2.9.1, which I've tried to repair with make > clean, make linux26, then make install but to no avail so I thought > it's time to bite the bullet and move to DAHDI. After installing DAHDI > 2.1.0.3 I get an error saying that the hardware is already in use. > I've tried to uninstall Zaptel as follows: > > - running /etc/init.d/zaptel stop > - running /bin/modprobe -r zaptel > - running make clean from the zaptel installation directory > > However, on rebooting Zap still loads, which causes DAHDI to throw an > error. > > I'm currently downloading the latest version of CentOS with a view to > rebuilding this machine to use DAHDI from the start if I can't sort > this out - but I'd rather fix what I've got if possible. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > >
On Thursday, January 15, 2009, D Tucny wrote:> It's so much nicer to use packages, in the case of CentOS, RPMs... > that way everything installed is owned by the package and removal of > the package removes most of what was installed...Thanks for the reply. I must be missing something, since all I've found are the tarballs at asterisk.org and mirrors. However, I'm going to rebuild once I've proved it all works (possibly on a machine of better specification) so it would be good to know where the packages can be found. Thanks again, -- Geoff