Olivier
2008-May-27 09:28 UTC
[asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?
Hello, Here (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+FastAGI), you can see : "You will even see some improvement when converting your existing AGIs into FastAGIs and running them on the same server as your phone system, though this is not always feasible or recommended." Why "this is not always feasible or recommended" ? Shall I understand "it's worth to try but if the burden is too heavy for a single machine, be prepared to use two machines" ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080527/13e1a7b9/attachment.htm
Matt Florell
2008-May-27 09:59 UTC
[asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?
Hello, There is nothing wrong at all with running FastAGI on the same server as Asterisk. In fact a couple years ago, moving our call logging script from an AGI to a FastAGI in VICIDIAL reduced the load on the machine by over 50%. This might be an extremem example, but it illustrates the gains that can be made using FastAGI even on the same server. MATT--- On 5/27/08, Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> wrote:> Hello, > > Here > (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+FastAGI), > you can see : > "You will even see some improvement when converting your existing AGIs into > FastAGIs and running them on the same server as your phone system, though > this is not always feasible or recommended." > > Why "this is not always feasible or recommended" ? > Shall I understand "it's worth to try but if the burden is too heavy for a > single machine, be prepared to use two machines" ? > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Benjamin Jacob
2008-May-27 10:12 UTC
[asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?
The entire idea of using FastAGI is to relieve the Asterisk server of handling all the processing done by the AGI processes spawned by AGI/DeadAGI on the current server. With FastAGI, the business logic processing is supposed to be done on another server, thereby reducing load on the current one. - Ben. --- On Tue, 5/27/08, Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> wrote:> From: Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> > Subject: [asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ? > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 9:28 AM > Hello, > > Here > (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+FastAGI), > you > can see : > "You will even see some improvement when converting > your existing AGIs into > FastAGIs and running them on the same server as your phone > system, though > this is not always feasible or recommended." > > Why "this is not always feasible or recommended" > ? > Shall I understand "it's worth to try but if the > burden is too heavy for a > single machine, be prepared to use two machines" ? > > Regards_______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by > http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users