Could someone please add to the documentation that Zaptel is required for SLA to work? It becomes sort of frustrating when you read the documentation a few times, keep on trying to get the thing to work for a few hours only to discover there is a "minor" omission in the documentation.
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 08:56 -0700, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:> Could someone please add to the documentation that Zaptel is required > for SLA to work? It becomes sort of frustrating when you read the > documentation a few times, keep on trying to get the thing to work for > a few hours only to discover there is a "minor" omission in the > documentation.You could fix the doc yourself and send a patch. That's more likely to get attention than just a "please fix <bla>". b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080430/2032de49/attachment.pgp
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 08:56 -0700, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:> Could someone please add to the documentation that Zaptel is required > for SLA to work? It becomes sort of frustrating when you read the > documentation a few times, keep on trying to get the thing to work for > a few hours only to discover there is a "minor" omission in the > documentation.Can you please explain what you mean with "zaptel is required for SLA to work"? Thanks, Patrick