asterisk users - Jun 2007 - Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA

Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?

 

Then it's time to move them to Canada or similar.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-t
o-be-outlawed.html 

 

 

Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
dean at cognation.net
<mailto:dean at cognation.net> +1-212-203-4357 Ph
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070628/1ff5e219/attachment.htm

Dean Collins wrote:
>
> Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running 
> asterisk?
>
> Then it?s time to move them to Canada or similar.
>
>
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-to-be-outlawed.html
>
>
Why it means nothing...

You're a carrier doing VoIP... Say a managed carrier. You
re-sell trunks. One of those trunks maintains their own PBX.
PBX admin decides to spoof out and is using a proxy say in
India. Hell make it Tor for that matter. What's to prosecute?
Prove it happened from where you say it did - remember the
burden is on the prosecution.

Now as the carrier (me) first thing I'm going to do is track
down which trunk it came from... Then go to that client...
So what happens if say the client was legitimately "owned"
and had various "proxied" addresses committing toll fraud.

Analogy... Gun dealer sells a .45 to an authorized gun
buyer. Gun owner leaves his gun at home. Someone breaks into
his home, cracks his gun safe, uses his gun for a crime,
re-enters and places the gun back in the safe. Now its
known it wasn't the gun owner because he was witnessed by
the court system and recorded say at jury duty... What do
you do, prosecute him? For what? Negligence?

It would be humorous to see how this plays out. To me its
more or less "voting time let's sign pretend laws for
brownie points"


-- 
===================================================J. Oquendo
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743
echo infiltrated.net|sed 's/^/sil@/g' 

"Wise men talk because they have something to say;
fools, because they have to say something." -- Plato


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5157 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070628/5667dc7b/attachment.bin

Anyone know if this is only to "bother some one" ? I have a client
that has a consulting business. The clients call in and his asterisk server
call's his cell when he is out of the office. It passes along the CID. I
hope the laws don't screw this up for those that change CID on every call
for legitimate reasons.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dean Collins 
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
  Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:43 PM
  Subject: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA


  Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running asterisk?

   

  Then it's time to move them to Canada or similar.

 
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-to-be-outlawed.html

   

   

  Regards,

  Dean Collins
  Cognation Pty Ltd
  dean at cognation.net
  +1-212-203-4357 Ph
  +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).

   

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070702/981298b8/attachment.htm