Giorgio Incantalupo
2007-Mar-16 09:35 UTC
[asterisk-users] proposal: a new mailing list for asterisk 1.4, why not?
Hi all, since Asterisk 1.4 seems to have too many differences from previous versions, wouldn't be nice to have a new mailing list? Giorgio Incantalupo
Peter Bowyer
2007-Mar-16 09:43 UTC
[asterisk-users] proposal: a new mailing list for asterisk 1.4, why not?
On 16/03/07, Giorgio Incantalupo <gincantalupo@fgasoftware.com> wrote:> Hi all, > since Asterisk 1.4 seems to have too many differences from previous > versions, wouldn't be nice to have a new mailing list?Here's a better question: why make everyone join another list when this one already works perfectly well? Have you experienced any difficulty asking or answering questions about Asterisk 1.4 here? -- Peter Bowyer Email: peter@bowyer.org
Steve Murphy
2007-Mar-16 09:44 UTC
[asterisk-users] proposal: a new mailing list for asterisk 1.4, why not?
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 17:35 +0100, Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:> Hi all, > since Asterisk 1.4 seems to have too many differences from previous > versions, wouldn't be nice to have a new mailing list? > > Giorgio IncantalupoAn interesting idea, but... my bet would be that most stuff discussed wouldn't really be specific to just 1.4... and what of the 1.2 and trunk? It'd end up being a pain to administer and sign up for so many lists... ! just my 2? murf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3239 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070316/76c78a12/smime.bin
Jason Parker
2007-Mar-16 09:46 UTC
[asterisk-users] proposal: a new mailing list for asterisk 1.4, why not?
----- "Giorgio Incantalupo" <gincantalupo@fgasoftware.com> wrote:> Hi all, > since Asterisk 1.4 seems to have too many differences from previous > versions, wouldn't be nice to have a new mailing list? > > Giorgio IncantalupoNo, it would be yet another list that people would have to subscribe to, and many of the questions/answers for one version are quite relevant to the other. This fracturing of the community would be very silly in my opinion, and is extremely unlikely to happen. -- Jason Parker Digium
dave cantera
2007-Mar-16 14:09 UTC
[asterisk-users] proposal: a new mailing list for asterisk 1.4, why not?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffcc" text="#330000"> here! here! they are different beasts...<br> <br> Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: <blockquote cite="mid45FAC76D.5030001@fgasoftware.com" type="cite">Hi all, <br> since Asterisk 1.4 seems to have too many differences from previous versions, wouldn't be nice to have a new mailing list? <br> <br> Giorgio Incantalupo <br> _______________________________________________ <br> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- <br> <br> asterisk-users mailing list <br> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a> <br> <br> <br> <br> </blockquote> <br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="132">-- Building Strong Relationships w/ Intelligent Customer Service -- Interlocking Business Solutions, LLC 856-380-0894 x5000 </pre> </body> </html>