I'm used to seeing the same versioning (maybe I've been gone too long) Is zaptel 1.2.15 the right one for asterisk 1.2.16 ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070314/e57842ef/attachment.htm
>From: "Wilson Pickett" <spamsucks2005@gmail.com> >Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:18:35 +0100 > >I'm used to seeing the same versioning (maybe I've been gone too long) > >Is zaptel 1.2.15 the right one for asterisk 1.2.16 ?It works. I've tried some other mixes and they also work. Yuan Liu
Wilson Pickett wrote:> I'm used to seeing the same versioning (maybe I've been gone too long) > > Is zaptel 1.2.15 the right one for asterisk 1.2.16 ?In Digium's infinite wisdom, they have seen fir to have version numbers no longer match, and also NOT provide any sort of map to give the rest of us a clue as to what goes with what. Probably to discourage wider use of the product? John Novack
Brent Torrenga
2007-Mar-16 09:21 UTC
[asterisk-users] Re: Zaptel version for asterisk 1.2.16
I discussed this with Digium techs, who recommended using the 1.4 version of Zaptel with the 1.2 version of Asterisk, at least with my hardware (TDM400P). The 1.4 zaptel does not yet support the HPEC (which won't run on my system anyways...), but does have a totally rewritten MG2 EC. I am running zaptel 1.4 on two 1.2 asterisk systems each with TDM400P's right now. Good performance with the MG2 as well. Sincerely, Brent A. Torrenga Torrenga Engineering, Inc. 907 Ridge Road Munster, Indiana 46321-1771 tel:+1 219 836 8918 x325 fax:+1 219 836 1138 email:brent.torrenga@torrenga.com web:www.torrenga.com