Carlos Alperin
2007-Feb-20 04:01 UTC
[asterisk-users] FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work. I'm running make linux26, & make install. Also, I have the kernel sources, and a symlink to /lib/modules/.... Also, I tried the make install-udev, since there was no zap device on /dev/zap but nothing. The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO ZAPTEL MODULE FOUND. Any clue about this? Thanks Carlos Alperin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070220/7c3e069d/attachment.htm
Carlos Alperin
2007-Feb-20 04:02 UTC
[asterisk-users] FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I forget, today I update my Fedora Core 5 from 2.6.18.1-2257 to 2.6.19-2288, of course I recompile then zaptel. And voila, don't work any more. Now I have both FC5 & FC6 with no longer ztdummy working. Do I need to go back to MS-DOS 3.22? Thanks, Carlos Alperin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070220/f50d71ef/attachment.htm
Benny Amorsen
2007-Feb-20 04:31 UTC
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
>>>>> "CA" == Carlos Alperin <calperin@senecacom.net> writes:CA> The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO CA> ZAPTEL MODULE FOUND. CA> Any clue about this? It is important that you do not rephrase error messages, but copy them directly. I probably can't help you even with the correct information though. /Benny
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 06:01 -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:> I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 > x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer > kernel versions.I build an RPM on i386 Fedora 7 Test 1 updated to Rawhide and it seems to work ok too.> I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I > finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I > run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy.If the modules aren't there how can you say everything is ok? :) Clearly something must be going wrong.> I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work.What did you modify with sed?> I'm running make linux26, & make install. Also, I have the kernel > sources, and a symlink to /lib/modules/....If I remember correctly you need to specify "make all". If you had paid any attention to the *entire* output of the compilation process than you would have noticed an error about this. Yes there is a lot of output but you really need to keep an eye on it. See if this helps: $ make clean $ make menuselect $ make all $ make install Regards, Patrick
Colin Anderson
2007-Feb-20 16:28 UTC
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I ran into this same problem compiling ndiswrapper on my MacBook with FC6. I uninstalled the old-time GCC and used yum to install gcc++3.3, I think it was and then re-compiled. FC6 has some wierdness with compiling. Ask me how fun it was getting everything working in my MacBook. -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Alperin [mailto:calperin@senecacom.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:10 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64 Importance: High Tzafrir, After delete the /lib/modules/2.6.2.6.19-1.2911.fc6, previous to move the misc directory to /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6xen This is what I get on trying running modprobe zaptel & ztdummy. [root@fedora6 zaptel-1.4.0]# modprobe zaptel FATAL: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6xen/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format [root@fedora6 zaptel-1.4.0]# modprobe ztdummy WARNING: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6xen/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format WARNING: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6xen/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format FATAL: Error inserting ztdummy (/lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6xen/misc/ztdummy.ko): Invalid module format FATAL: Error running install command for ztdummy Carlos Alperin _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Tzafrir Cohen
2007-Feb-21 00:59 UTC
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:53:50PM -0600, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > >obviously, the makefile used an incorrect "kernel source tree" to build > >your systems. The package kernel-devel provides a partial kernel source > >tree which is good enough for building modules (or at least: for > >building Zaptel). However it seems that the wrong one was used in your > >case. > > In my experience (Mandrake) the EXTRAVERSION variable in the kernel > Makefile does not match running kernel version and so the Zaptel modules > are installed in the wrong directory. Fix that to match what you are > running, then run a make clean && make install in the Zaptel directory.In my experince (Debian) EXTRAVERSION in the .config file is not set, but the extra version is set from elsewhere (in include/config/kernel.release I believe). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
Axel Thimm
2007-Feb-21 15:06 UTC
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:> I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 > very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel > versions.If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that are available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even packages for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available: http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk/ http://atrpms.net/name/zaptel/ If you add atrpms to your yum config all you have to do is yum install asterisk zaptel zaptel-kmdl-`uname -r` If you want yum to automatically install new kmdls for new kernels also install yum-plugin-kmdl, and then you only need to use yum update and not worry again (or worry less ...).> I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, > and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe > zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. > > I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work. > > I'm running make linux26, & make install. Also, I have the kernel sources, > and a symlink to /lib/modules/.... > > Also, I tried the make install-udev, since there was no zap device on > /dev/zap but nothing. > > The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO ZAPTEL MODULE > FOUND. > > Any clue about this? > > Thanks > > Carlos Alperin-- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070221/1dd47c5f/attachment.pgp