Hi List, Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP well and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issue on one of the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there isnt enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? Thanks. Dovid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061113/50104f6c/attachment.htm
I've been looking for this as well.. I need to support up to 20 VOIP phones over Internet as the Asterisk server is off-site. We'll have multiple cable modems or DSL routers. I found this device which looks promising - does anyone have any experience with this? http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balance Todd On Nov 13, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Dovid B wrote:> Hi List, > Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP well > and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issue on one > of the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there > isnt enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? > > Thanks. > > Dovid-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061114/4c005e0f/attachment.htm
LONDON, UK (14th November 2006) - Bicom Systems announced today it has released its first freeware software to the "Asterisk Community", OutCall. This is to be the first of similar releases of proprietary tools that can assist users with getting the most out of Asterisk and will also be released as freeware. As part of Bicom Systems wish to support the Community the Company will also be asking if members could make donations through PayPal to donations@bicomsystems.com as they see appropriate for any benefit they receive from OutCall. These donations will be used exclusively to encourage the development of Asterisk through the offering of Bonuses or similar rewards. For full details on Bicom Systems products please visit http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/C/P/319/288/. To download a copy of OutCall, please visit www.bicomsystems.com Documentation is available at www.bicomsystems.com/docs/outcall/ . For more information, please contact: Stephen Wingfield 44-20-7043-3489 steve [at}bicomsystems [dot}com
Sweet, now that is interesting http://hotbrick.com/produto.asp?tipo=2&codPro=22 anyone have any comments on the load balancing capability of these? Cheers, Dean ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mailing List Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 10:17 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover http://hotbrick.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Dean Collins <mailto:Dean@cognation.net> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:38 AM Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover Are you looking for load balancing or failover. Also is there a cheaper way of implementing load balancing than $845 appliance? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061114/f364c506/attachment.htm
There are several dual-WAN routers with load balancing and failover, including the Xincom Twin-WAN series that I have tested OK with SIP (as NAT): http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php . Their other products probably work, too. Keep in mind that load balancing on these devices assigns each TCP/IP *connection* to its own WAN interface. So a large transfer on a single connection is limited by the bandwidth of whichever interface it's started on, even if the transfer starts slow enough to get assigned to a smaller bandwidth interface, then expands to require the bandwidth from the other WAN. The tech to de/multiplex streams works "well" only when connecting to a single router endpoint, over relatively few hops that can lengthen unpredictably the path some deplexed tackets travel. UDP works better, but it still doesn't really work that well. What works well is assigning different WANs to different apps' traffic, using multiple WANs for failover, or just accepting that these techs are better than nothing, and offer cheap ways to at least avoid a single point of failure in the WAN scheme. On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 08:07 -0700, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote:> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:07:41 -0500 > From: "Dean Collins" <Dean@cognation.net> > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: > <677A75F88616F04E897D9D0E8397B10D06DC0F@cognationsvr1.Cognation.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Hi Jason, > I was looking for an external solution outside of my asterisk box so > that I can load balance my other website/email traffic as well. > > > Cheers, > > Dean > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jason > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 11:00 AM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > > If you don't mind using linux, linux can do some fairly intense load > > balancing all built in. Check out the Linux Virtual Server project. > As > > for WAN failover, if you again don't mind using linux, you can > script > a > > simple ping to the internet (I would ping at least 3 hosts) and if > that > > fails, fail to your second ISP. You can also do some crazy fun > stuff > > with linux advance routing and bonding. > > > > Jason > > The place where you made your stand never mattered, > > only that you were there... and still on your feet > > > > > > > > Dean Collins wrote: > > > > > > Are you looking for load balancing or failover. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also is there a cheaper way of implementing load balancing than > $845 > > > appliance? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > *From:* asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > > > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of > *Todd- > > > Asterisk > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 November 2006 9:26 AM > > > *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been looking for this as well.. I need to support up to 20 > VOIP > > > phones over Internet as the Asterisk server is off-site. We'll > have > > > multiple cable modems or DSL routers. > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this device which looks promising - does anyone have any > > > experience with this? > > > > > > http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balance > > > > > > > > > > > > Todd > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Dovid B wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi List, > > > > > > Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP > well > > > and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issue on > one > of > > > the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there isnt > > > enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dovid-- (C) Matthew Rubenstein
We've had great results with Astrocom powerlink for load balancing outbound wan connections. =====================Jeronimo Romero EUS Networks Email: jromero@euscorp.com Cell: 917-332-7238 Office: 212-624-5943 Web: www.euscorp.com =====================> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dean Collins > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:57 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Cc: email@mattruby.com > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > Thanks for the reply matthew, basically I've been looking at going toa> dmz model for a while as currently everything runs through a single > sbs2003 server and when it's churning drives doing something sometimes > audio errors occur. > > > Cheers, > > Dean > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Rubenstein [mailto:email@mattruby.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 11:41 AM > > To: Dean Collins > > Cc: Asterisk-Users > > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > > There are several dual-WAN routers with load balancing and > failover, > > including the Xincom Twin-WAN series that I have tested OK with SIP > (as > > NAT): http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php . Their other products > probably > > work, too. > > > > Keep in mind that load balancing on these devices assigns each > > TCP/IP > > *connection* to its own WAN interface. So a large transfer on asingle> > connection is limited by the bandwidth of whichever interface it's > > started on, even if the transfer starts slow enough to get assignedto> a > > smaller bandwidth interface, then expands to require the bandwidth > from > > the other WAN. The tech to de/multiplex streams works "well" onlywhen> > connecting to a single router endpoint, over relatively few hopsthat> > can lengthen unpredictably the path some deplexed tackets travel.UDP> > works better, but it still doesn't really work that well. What works > > well is assigning different WANs to different apps' traffic, using > > multiple WANs for failover, or just accepting that these techs are > > better than nothing, and offer cheap ways to at least avoid a single > > point of failure in the WAN scheme. > > > > > > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 08:07 -0700, > > asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:07:41 -0500 > > > From: "Dean Collins" <Dean@cognation.net> > > > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > > > Message-ID: > > > > ><677A75F88616F04E897D9D0E8397B10D06DC0F@cognationsvr1.Cognation.local>> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > > > > Hi Jason, > > > I was looking for an external solution outside of my asterisk boxso> > > that I can load balance my other website/email traffic as well. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: > > > asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > > > > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jason > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 11:00 AM > > > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > > > > > > If you don't mind using linux, linux can do some fairly intense > load > > > > balancing all built in. Check out the Linux Virtual Server > project. > > > As > > > > for WAN failover, if you again don't mind using linux, you can > > > script > > > a > > > > simple ping to the internet (I would ping at least 3 hosts) andif> > > that > > > > fails, fail to your second ISP. You can also do some crazy fun > > > stuff > > > > with linux advance routing and bonding. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > The place where you made your stand never mattered, > > > > only that you were there... and still on your feet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dean Collins wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Are you looking for load balancing or failover. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also is there a cheaper way of implementing load balancingthan> > > $845 > > > > > appliance? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > *From:* asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > > > > > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of > > > *Todd- > > > > > Asterisk > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 November 2006 9:26 AM > > > > > *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been looking for this as well.. I need to support up to20> > > VOIP > > > > > phones over Internet as the Asterisk server is off-site.We'll> > > have > > > > > multiple cable modems or DSL routers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this device which looks promising - does anyone haveany> > > > > experience with this? > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Todd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Dovid B wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi List, > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP > > > well > > > > > and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issueon> > > one > > > of > > > > > the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there > isnt > > > > > enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dovid > > -- > > > > (C) Matthew Rubenstein > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I have not seen anything yet that does failover based on SIP (i.e. seeing if there is a lag with sip). Anyone know if that exists ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Dovid B To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:49 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Dual Wan Router with Failover Hi List, Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP well and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issue on one of the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there isnt enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? Thanks. Dovid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061114/4f161c2a/attachment.htm