asterisk users - Aug 2005 - TDM400P - All extensions have same CallerID

I've been searching the forums and on the list to see if this has been
addressed. If it has, could someone point me to the thread to fix or at
least acknowledge it is an issue and what is causing it. Posting to the list
was last resort as I couldn't find a solution anywhere else.

Setup:
Asterisk@Home 1.3 (this is my first system, so path of least resistance)
Digium TDM400P (2 FXS on ports 1 & 2, 2 FXO on 3& 4)

My FXS extentions are 201 and 210. Both of my FXS extentions report being
the same extension when doing a *65. It is always the last extension
configured as well, in this case 210. In fact, when recording prompts, even
if I'm on extension 201, I have to tell the system that I'm on extension
210. I deleted the second extention and 201 started acting properly. I added
a new extension (x400) and both are being reported as 400 now. To make
things even more confusing, calls can be placed to the proper extension, so 
it
seems to be something with CallerID, but I can figure out what it is. As 
stated,
this was my first system so I used AAH to get up and running fast and then
work backwards to learn and use the system. I started with AAH 1.1 and
everything worked fine for about 2 weeks, then I noticed a problem when I
started having messages on x201 but the light wasn't blinking. To the best
of my memory, when I started out I didn't have this problem. Both extensions
were acting normally. I didn't put on any AAH or Asterisk updates. I'm
running AAH 1.3 now just to see if it would fix the problem.

Any and all suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Mike

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:02:30AM -0600, Mike Putnam wrote:
> Any and all suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Provide some useful input:

* the relevant config files

* a CLI trace of the course of a problematic call, after you have set
  verbosity to a resonable value. E.g: 'set verbose 3'.

Isn't this "in the FAQ"? (what exactly is "The FAQ"?)

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         | tzafrir@jbr.cohens.org.il | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                           | a Mutt's  
tzafrir@cohens.org.il |                           |  best
ICQ# 16849755         |                           | friend

Check your "zapata.conf" file.  Your terminal profile options section
under
[channels] should be ended by adding the associated channel, i.e. channel =>
1

Sample two port config:

[channels]
;
; Default language
;
language=en

; Default terminal profile FXS PORT1
;
context=internal
signalling=fxo_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid="Line 1" <2001>
callwaiting=yes
callwaitingcallerid=yes
callreturn=yes
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
mailbox=2001
group=1

channel => 1

; Default terminal profile FXS PORT2
;
context=internal
signalling=fxo_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid="Line 2" <2002>
callwaiting=yes
callwaitingcallerid=yes
callreturn=yes
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
mailbox=2002
group=1

channel => 2



"Mike Putnam" <asterisk@mikeputnam.com> wrote in message
news:<003701c59a97$de0fe510$058fa8c0@dragonship>...
> I've been searching the forums and on the list to see if this has been
> addressed. If it has, could someone point me to the thread to fix or at
> least acknowledge it is an issue and what is causing it. Posting to the
list
> was last resort as I couldn't find a solution anywhere else.
> 
> Setup:
> Asterisk@Home 1.3 (this is my first system, so path of least resistance)
> Digium TDM400P (2 FXS on ports 1 & 2, 2 FXO on 3& 4)
> 
> My FXS extentions are 201 and 210. Both of my FXS extentions report being
> the same extension when doing a *65. It is always the last extension
> configured as well, in this case 210. In fact, when recording prompts,
even
> if I'm on extension 201, I have to tell the system that I'm on
extension
> 210. I deleted the second extention and 201 started acting properly. I
added
> a new extension (x400) and both are being reported as 400 now. To make
> things even more confusing, calls can be placed to the proper extension,
so 
> it
> seems to be something with CallerID, but I can figure out what it is. As 
> stated,
> this was my first system so I used AAH to get up and running fast and then
> work backwards to learn and use the system. I started with AAH 1.1 and
> everything worked fine for about 2 weeks, then I noticed a problem when I
> started having messages on x201 but the light wasn't blinking. To the
best
> of my memory, when I started out I didn't have this problem. Both
extensions
> were acting normally. I didn't put on any AAH or Asterisk updates.
I'm
> running AAH 1.3 now just to see if it would fix the problem.
> 
> Any and all suggestions are greatly appreciated.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

yuppers.......

On 8/6/05, Zachary Whitley <mail@zacharywhitley.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:34 -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
> > No real start, Channel ends and the following is assumed to be the
next channel.
> >
> 
> Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel>
statement with the configuration for the channel coming before the
> channel statement.
> 
> As in...
> 
> 
> these=are
> configs=for
> the=first
> channel=1
> 
> these=are
> configs=for
> the=second
> channel=2
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 

-- 
---
Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
lathama@lathama.com - lathama@yahoo.com - lathama@gmail.com
If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email!
---

As I recall, should channels start as channel=>2 and not channel=2?

I have all mine config'ed channel => 2 and it works fine...

Greg 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Time
Bandit
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 3:39 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TDM400P - All extensions have same
CallerID
> Ok, so the scope of the configuration is from channel= to channel= 
> statement with the configuration for the channel coming before the 
> channel statement.
> 
> As in...
> 
> 
> these=are
> configs=for
> the=first
> channel=1
> 
> these=are
> configs=for
> the=second
> channel=2
In fact, all the settings that you don't change stay the same as with
the last channel.

Ex.: 
callerid=asreceived
otherparam=1
channel=2

otherparam=2
channel=3

In channel 3, the callerid param is still "asreceived" because nothing
changed it

hth
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users