Due to the dismissal of the stable-1.0 cvs source code, I've changed policy of the Asterisk Wiki - we now document CVS head. I would like all contributors to document which version of Asterisk (date) an addition was applied to, so readers can find out if a new function works with their version or not. There's a lot of missing documentation of new functions and options in CVS head up there, so please help us update. Next time we fork, we'll consider changing this policy. Thank you for your help with keeping this valuable community resource up-to-date. /O
Would it be a good idea for some on to add skeleton pages for new featrues so that atleast more people know about the new featrues and fill in the pages once they have had a chance to check/test. Just a thought. Umar. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson Sent: 13 June 2004 22:00 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; asterisk-docs@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Wiki now based on CVS head Due to the dismissal of the stable-1.0 cvs source code, I've changed policy of the Asterisk Wiki - we now document CVS head. I would like all contributors to document which version of Asterisk (date) an addition was applied to, so readers can find out if a new function works with their version or not. There's a lot of missing documentation of new functions and options in CVS head up there, so please help us update. Next time we fork, we'll consider changing this policy. Thank you for your help with keeping this valuable community resource up-to-date. /O _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Hi!> Due to the dismissal of the stable-1.0 cvs source code, I've changed policy of the Asterisk > Wiki - we now document CVS head. I would like all contributors to document which version of > Asterisk (date) an addition was applied to, so readers can find out if a new function works > with their version or not.Any chance to arrange a system that utilizes "build" numbers? That would be easier in handling than just dates. Cheers, Philipp