Michael Graves
2004-Jan-03 22:09 UTC
AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call instances is engaged. Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension 2000 or 2000-2004? Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter? Thanks, Michael On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:>Hi Olle! > >I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email). > >BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share. > >Christian > >> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- >> admin@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 >> An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? >> >> Christian Stredicke wrote: >> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the >> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this: >> > >> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0 >> > Contact: <sip:123@192.168.0.99;line=h35h345> >> > >> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we don?t >> find >> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a >> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I >> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related >> to >> > this problem. >> > >> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact >> > "sip:123@192.168.0.99;line=h35h345", NOT "sip:123@192.168.0.99"! >> Parameters >> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded. >> Ok, Christian, let's fix this. >> >> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always >> looking >> for documentation :-) >> >> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is >> discarded. >> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom >> phones work correctly >> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-) >> >> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However, >> there are >> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they >> need proper >> and detailed input on what to fix. >> >> I've opened a bug >> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732 >> >> Let's continue adding information there. >> >> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM. >> Search on "Snom" >> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community! >> >> /O >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj@earthlink.net FWD 54245 "I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill "The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it isn't." - Ian Hunter ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE================== -- Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj@earthlink.net FWD 54245 "I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704
Olle E. Johansson
2004-Jan-04 02:34 UTC
AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Michael Graves wrote:> Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this > thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into > full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the linesOlle Wrote:>>>I've opened a bug >>>http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732 >>> >>>Let's continue adding information there. >>>The best way to follow up is to check the bug report, usually when we open a bug, debate goes on in the bug tracker system to make sure we have all information on testing, patches and possible new errors in the same place. There's no solution yet, but some discussion and some coding experiments. /O
Rich Adamson
2004-Jan-04 06:58 UTC
AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
Mike, The v2.03f code (alpha/beta?) did correct the multi-line problems very nicely, however I think the snom folks might have another tweak or two to make to this code. If your snom 200 is running in a business production environment, you might want to wait a little. If you're using it in a test/home/soho environment, it would appear the code is good enough to play nicely in the multi-extn environment. Hint: after upgrading to v2.03f, on the web interface goto Settings/Base and turn off the option for "Challenge Response on Phone". I've not tested this extensively, but v2.03f appears to be very close to what I'd consider a production release for basic sip/asterisk use then any release that I've tested in the last several months. (Your milage may vary!) In my limited testing, the code handled two extns well, nice Call Waiting indication, call hold, alternating between extn 1 and 2 nicely, etc. The only somewhat unusual operation that I noticed was: If the phone as two calls going on (extn 1 and extn 2, one of which is on hold), hanging up the phone causes the two extns to be bridged together without any indication that happened on the phone itself (all LED's are off). "That" could get to be embarrasing as it would suggest two inbound calls from customers/friends/etc are now tied together without you knowing it, and no way to recover from that accident. Rich ------------------------> Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this > thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into > full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines > configured so that it does not return a busy reply when only one call > instances is engaged. > > Am I supposed to create multiple extensions on my asterisk dialplan to > reflect the 5 call instances? That is, would the snom 200 be extension > 2000 or 2000-2004? > > Also, did the 2.03f firmware resolve the matter? > > Thanks, > > Michael > > On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:05:39 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote: > > >Hi Olle! > > > >I put something into trouble ticket (I guess you get this as email). > > > >BTW 2.03f is available at http://snom.com/download/share. > > > >Christian > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > >> admin@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 > >> An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > >> Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? > >> > >> Christian Stredicke wrote: > >> > We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the > >> > line indication. When we register we place a contact like this: > >> > > >> > REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0 > >> > Contact: <sip:123@192.168.0.99;line=h35h345> > >> > > >> > When we receive the 200 Ok, we search for the "h35h345". If we don’t > >> find > >> > it, we try to guess which line is affected. This is relatively easy on a > >> > REGISTER response, but on an incoming INVITE we have serious problems. I > >> > think some of the challenging and line-assignment problems are related > >> to > >> > this problem. > >> > > >> > Strictly speaking, we register the contact > >> > "sip:123@192.168.0.99;line=h35h345", NOT "sip:123@192.168.0.99"! > >> Parameters > >> > are an essential part of a URI which must not be discarded. > >> Ok, Christian, let's fix this. > >> > >> First, I'm curious, is the "line=" parameter specified somewhere? (Always > >> looking > >> for documentation :-) > >> > >> Secondly, in many places in the sip channel, everything after the ";" is > >> discarded. > >> I would really appreciate if Snom could help us fixing this, so Snom > >> phones work correctly > >> and fully with Asterisk. (Have a new Snom 200 on my desk :-) > >> > >> I'm not an experienced C programmer, so I can't fix this myself. However, > >> there are > >> experienced C programmers in the community that will fix this, but they > >> need proper > >> and detailed input on what to fix. > >> > >> I've opened a bug > >> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000732 > >> > >> Let's continue adding information there. > >> > >> BTW, there's some other Snom problems where we need input from SNOM. > >> Search on "Snom" > >> in the bug tracker. Thank you for participating in the Asterisk community! > >> > >> /O > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Asterisk-Users mailing list > >> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > -- > Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com > Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com > Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj@earthlink.net > > FWD 54245 > > "I am easily satisfied with the very best" - Winston Churchill > > "The questions arisen, is this a prison? Some say it is, but I say it > isn't." > - Ian Hunter > > ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 > > > > ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE==================> > -- > Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com > Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com > Pixel Power Inc. gravesmj@earthlink.net > FWD 54245 > > "I know nothing, but I keep listening." - INXS > > ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704 > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users---------------End of Original Message-----------------
Christian Stredicke
2004-Jan-05 11:32 UTC
AW: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?
We have a pre-release candidate at http://snom.com/download/share for snom 200 (2.02h). We found one issue with DNS names for NTP (only IP supported in this version) and a problem with a call park/pickup (which should not have any affect with Asterisk). Anyway, I think it?s a big progress in comparison to the previous release. Please feel free to try it out! Christian> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > admin@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von VoiceLynx > Gesendet: Montag, 5. Januar 2004 17:47 > An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Betreff: RE: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined > anyone? > > Christian has been testing the snom code against on of our Asterisk > systems. > > 2.03f did address some multiple registration issues but the newest snom > 200 version is 2.03g - that has addressed some additional registration > issues. > > New versions for the other snom phones are expected today. > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users