Ernest W. Lessenger
2003-Aug-21 13:26 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + SNOM + Pound and star keys
How are people handling call transfer with SNOM phones? We are okay with the "#" transfer workaround, but I worry about how that will work with other systems that expect me to be able to "press # to return to the previous menu" or similar. Thanks, --Ernest
Steven Critchfield
2003-Aug-21 13:35 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + SNOM + Pound and star keys
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 15:26, Ernest W. Lessenger wrote:> How are people handling call transfer with SNOM phones? We are okay with > the "#" transfer workaround, but I worry about how that will work with > other systems that expect me to be able to "press # to return to the > previous menu" or similar.When you dial out, don't enable transfer. Only enable transfer on calls dialing in. -- Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com>
> How are people handling call transfer with SNOM phones? We are okay with > the "#" transfer workaround, but I worry about how that will work with > other systems that expect me to be able to "press # to return to the > previous menu" or similar. > > Thanks, > --Ernest >Whats wrong with using the SIP transfer built into the SNOM? -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
> That's pretty much my question :) I've heard that it doesn't work well, and > testing here confirms that. Transferring someone to and extension just > disconnects both ends. > > --Ernest >Thats strange, I have found the SIP transfer on the Snom200's to work just fine.. Granted I haven't used it a million times but when I have used it its been fine.. Can do both cosultative and non-consitative transfer with no probs.. I must mention I am transfering between two Snom's, I havent tried between the Snom and another phone.. maybe I should give that a try!!. :) Later.. -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
mawali@news.icns.com
2003-Aug-22 18:20 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] chan_h323 and packetization period
I see there seems there is no setting in the h323.conf to set SetTxFramesInPacket for a capability. I have hacked it, would it be a good idea to add it to the config file??. Maybe whe I am done with all the hacks I should submit a patch. Regards On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 mawali@news.icns.com wrote:> Hi > I am trying to control packetization period for G729 codec. How do I > control packet size. Is there a way? or will I need to hack it. I will try > to get a patch together for the stuff that I am trying to fix in > chan_h323. > > Regards > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >