asterisk users - Mar 2003 - T4000P vs. Tormenta 2

hi there's a few things i REALLY need to know
the T4000P is based on the Tormenta 2 so what is the differance?
a few things more;
1. is there a differance between the two?
2. if so what are the the differances?
3. which one is more stable? based on changes and testing :-)
4. is the Tormenta 2 FCC approved. 
did a search on their (FCC's) db, and found nothing for Tormenta 2 or the
T4000P. this is not good because the cards can't be legally connected to the
PSTN without FCC cert. and my insurance will not cover us without certification.
please advise.
dwayne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030324/dd98ff68/attachment.htm

On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 11:40, d hinton wrote:
> hi there's a few things i REALLY need to know
> the T4000P is based on the Tormenta 2 so what is the differance?
The T400P is PCI and the tormenta 2 is ISA. The tormenta2 is a home
build card, the T400P is factory made. T400P comes with an hour of
support by Digium. 
> a few things more;
> 1. is there a differance between the two?
> 2. if so what are the the differances?
> 3. which one is more stable? based on changes and testing :-)
The PCI T400P is less susceptable to chipset speeds as there is way more
than enough overhead for the data on the PCI bus.
> 4. is the Tormenta 2 FCC approved. 
> did a search on their (FCC's) db, and found nothing for Tormenta 2 or
> the T4000P. this is not good because the cards can't be legally
> connected to the PSTN without FCC cert. and my insurance will not
> cover us without certification.
http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0204/0134.html
T400P approved, but no numbers mentioned.

-- 
Steven Critchfield  <critch@basesys.com>