Keir Fraser
2005-Sep-13 19:07 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Automatic bigsmp detection for i386 systemswith more than 8 cpus
On 13 Sep 2005, at 20:08, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:> Thanks for the comments. I think you should be receiving these > systems soon. > > I assume you are talking about the "big bang re-sync" of the hypervisor > and not of domain0 kernels :) The patch is for Hypervisor.That''s correct. There are a bunch of platform bringup files we borrow very directly from Linux and I like to sync them up periodically and entirely, rather than piecemeal. I don''t think this patch is high-priority enough to break that general rule. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Kamble, Nitin A
2005-Sep-13 19:08 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Automatic bigsmp detection for i386 systemswith more than 8 cpus
Hi Keir, Ian, Thanks for the comments. I think you should be receiving these systems soon. I assume you are talking about the "big bang re-sync" of the hypervisor and not of domain0 kernels :) The patch is for Hypervisor. Thanks & Regards, Nitin ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- Sr Software Engineer Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corp>-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk] >Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 5:44 AM >To: Ian Pratt >Cc: xen-devel; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk; Kamble, Nitin A >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Automatic bigsmp detection for i386 >systemswith more than 8 cpus > > >On 13 Sep 2005, at 12:18, Ian Pratt wrote: > >> >> If only we had a bigsmp to test it on :-) >> >> From my POV it makes sense to include it, and a cursory look through >> looked sane. Not sure whether Keir has had a chance to look yet. > >I like to keep those files reasonably in sync with Linux, and prefer to >do that with ''big bang'' re-sync every one in a while. I don''t see that >patch in 2.6.13.1, and I''m wary about applying it until I see it in a >mainline kernel.org kernel. In any case, the drawback of not applying >right now is simply that bigsmp systems need bigsmp added to the boot >line, which isn;t too much of a hardship for the very few users it >affects. Probably I''ll do another big re-sync with 2.6.14, and >presumably that will get us the auto-bigsmp patch at the same time. > > -- Keir_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel