King, Steven R
2006-Jan-25 23:35 UTC
RE: grant table anxiety [was RE: [Xen-devel] GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref]
Per Mark''s pointers to LWN articles, Linux''s page remapping scheme is churning. Once that settles, is a reasonable test of "sensibleness" that paravirtual Linux be able to map shared pages in the same manner as traditional Linux maps device based memory? -----Original Message----- From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Ian Pratt Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:37 PM To: King, Steven R; Keir Fraser; Mark Williamson; Rusty Russell Cc: xen-devel Subject: RE: grant table anxiety [was RE: [Xen-devel] GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref]> I''ve aired grievances against grant tables in other threads, but now > I''m getting worried all over again. Your suggestions give a hint of > the intricate handling required to manage shared pages. IMHO, this > pushes paravirtual guests to unnatural lengths, not to mention > prospects in pure-virtual environments.Allowing user space to get access to shared pages by allowing them to map pages in a special device seems pretty sensible, and is pretty trivial to implement in the kernel.> Could we dispense with these complexities if a 3rd party > (Xen?) owned shared pages?No, the accounting issue is totally orthogonal. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel