Hi all, I''ve posted a preview release of the next generation of VM-Tools. This generation of the tool chain will be different from the existing versions of VM-Tools in a number of important ways. Below are the highlights: o Single daemon based system o Support for 3.0 and 2.0.x trees o Improved logging via syslog o Many others This is just a preview release and is not meant to be used for anything other than simply understanding the new architecture. The README in the tarball includes a list of what''s working and what''s not working. We anticipate a full release within the new few weeks. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/aliguori/vm-tools-0.0.9a.tar.gz Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jacob Gorm Hansen
2005-Apr-29 00:08 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Preview of Next Generation VM-Tools
Anthony Liguori wrote:> Hi all, > > I''ve posted a preview release of the next generation of VM-Tools. This > generation of the tool chain will be different from the existing > versions of VM-Tools in a number of important ways. Below are the > highlights: > > o Single daemon based system > o Support for 3.0 and 2.0.x trees > o Improved logging via syslog > o Many others > > This is just a preview release and is not meant to be used for anything > other than simply understanding the new architecture. The README in the > tarball includes a list of what''s working and what''s not working. >hi Anthony, there seems to be a race in the creation of new domains, if I run the commands from the README in a script, xenctld prints: xenctld: New domain-0 xenctld: Binding to port 0:0 xenctld: Got message destined 1:0:1 xenctld: Received msg for unknown domain-1 xenctld: New domain-1 xenctld: evtchn_bind_interdomain(32752,1,0,1) failed: Invalid argument xenctld: Failed opening event channel Whereas If I put a ''sleep 1'' between each of the lines in the script, the domain starts up and connects the conosole without problems. Jacob\\ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:> hi Anthony,Hi Jacob,> > there seems to be a race in the creation of new domains, if I run the > commands from the README in a script, xenctld prints: > > xenctld: New domain-0 > xenctld: Binding to port 0:0 > xenctld: Got message destined 1:0:1 > xenctld: Received msg for unknown domain-1 > xenctld: New domain-1 > xenctld: evtchn_bind_interdomain(32752,1,0,1) failed: Invalid argument > xenctld: Failed opening event channel > > Whereas If I put a ''sleep 1'' between each of the lines in the script, > the domain starts up and connects the conosole without problems.I noticed that myself. Xencltd uses a timeout to update it''s information about domains. What it needs to do is make sure that any entry into xenctld causes the information to be updated. That''s for pointing it out. It''ll be fixed for the next release. Regards,> Jacob\\ >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jacob Gorm Hansen
2005-Apr-29 04:03 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Preview of Next Generation VM-Tools
Anthony Liguori wrote:> Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:>> >> Whereas If I put a ''sleep 1'' between each of the lines in the script, >> the domain starts up and connects the conosole without problems. > > I noticed that myself. Xencltd uses a timeout to update it''s > information about domains. What it needs to do is make sure that any > entry into xenctld causes the information to be updated. > > That''s for pointing it out. It''ll be fixed for the next release.Great, looking forward to that. Also, there seems to be a problem with newlines in the console, hitting <ENTER> a few times yields: ~ # ~ # ~ # ~ # Perhaps carriage-returns are not handled correctly? Jacob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 4/28/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I''ve posted a preview release of the next generation of VM-Tools. This > generation of the tool chain will be different from the existing > versions of VM-Tools in a number of important ways. Below are the > highlights: > > o Single daemon based system > o Support for 3.0 and 2.0.x trees > o Improved logging via syslog > o Many others > > This is just a preview release and is not meant to be used for anything > other than simply understanding the new architecture. The README in the > tarball includes a list of what''s working and what''s not working. > > We anticipate a full release within the new few weeks. > > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/aliguori/vm-tools-0.0.9a.tar.gz >Anthony, looks like you forgot the Makefile target (compile and clean) of bindings/ ? regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel