for setting the hardware clock: i think things like this shouldn''t be granted to dom0 by default, but be manually granted to specific doms. it would be preferable to run ntpd in an unprivileged domain, dom0 is just too valuable for this. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> for setting the hardware clock: > i think things like this shouldn''t be granted to dom0 by > default, but be manually granted to specific doms. > > it would be preferable to run ntpd in an unprivileged domain, dom0 is > just too valuable for this.That''s a fair point. The intention is to split up the ''privilege'' in to a bit mask to enable finer grained control and granting of specific privileges to domains, (like the ''CAP_*'' stuff in Linux). It should be a fairly simple task to split the privileges up -- one for the todo list. Ian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> That''s a fair point. The intention is to split up the ''privilege'' > in to a bit mask to enable finer grained control and granting of > specific privileges to domains, (like the ''CAP_*'' stuff in > Linux). It should be a fairly simple task to split the privileges > up -- one for the todo list.Yes, this needs to be considered at the same time we refactor the Xen hypercall interface. eg. perhaps not all current dom0_ops should be dom0_ops (access should instead be controlled by some other capability). Adjusting it so that access to each `privileged'' hypercall is controlled by one capability each might be neat, and help work out a neat rearrangement for the hypercalls. -- Keir ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
I can''t figure out how to install xen for the life of me.
Here''s as far as i have gotten.
Obviously its not getting the linux kernel version or something.
Looks like i am running 2.4.20-8amp SMP on redhat 9.0.
I tried to things one other try gives me cannot handle file libc.so.6 with
tls date unable to identify linux version.
If somebody can walk me through i would be internally grateful.
Or even login and help me .
Thanks
--------output from host----------------
[root@10k /tmp]# ./xen-clone
+ ''['' -d /usr/groups/xeno/ -a -d /usr/groups/srgboot
'']''
+ BK_REP=bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-1.0.bk
+ LINUX_DIR=..
+ DEST_DIR=xeno-clone
++ basename bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-1.0.bk
+ DEST_BK_REP=xeno-1.0.bk
+ echo usage: xen-clone bk_repository dest_dir orig_linux_dir
usage: xen-clone bk_repository dest_dir orig_linux_dir
+ echo Source BK Repository : bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-1.0.bk
Source BK Repository : bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-1.0.bk
+ echo Destination Dir/Repository : xeno-clone/xeno-1.0.bk
Destination Dir/Repository : xeno-clone/xeno-1.0.bk
+ echo Pristine Linux Source directory : ..
Pristine Linux Source directory : ..
+ mkdir -p xeno-clone
+ cd xeno-clone
++ /bin/pwd
+ TOP=/tmp/xeno-clone
+ ''['' ''!'' -d xeno-1.0.bk
'']''
+ bk clone bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-1.0.bk xeno-1.0.bk
cannot handle file ''libc.so.6'' with TLS data
++ /bin/ls -ld xeno-1.0.bk/xenolinux-sparse
/bin/ls: xeno-1.0.bk/xenolinux-sparse: No such file or directory
++ sed -e ''s!^.*xenolinux-\([0-9.]\+\)-sparse!\1!''
+ LINUX_VER+ ''['' ''!'' -d linux-
'']''
+ tar -zxf ../linux-.tar.gz
tar (child): ../linux-.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
+ tar -zxf ../linux-.tgz
tar (child): ../linux-.tgz: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
+ cp -a ../linux- .
cp: cannot stat `../linux-'': No such file or directory
+ wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-.tar.gz -O-
--06:03:23-- ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-.tar.gz
=> `-''
Resolving ftp.kernel.org... + tar -zxf -
done.
Connecting to ftp.kernel.org[204.152.189.116]:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub/linux/kernel/v2.4 ... done.
==> PORT ... done. ==> RETR linux-.tar.gz ...
No such file `linux-.tar.gz''.
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
+ exit -1
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> I can''t figure out how to install xen for the life of me. > Here''s as far as i have gotten. > Obviously its not getting the linux kernel version or something. > Looks like i am running 2.4.20-8amp SMP on redhat 9.0. > I tried to things one other try gives me cannot handle file libc.so.6 with > tls date unable to identify linux version. > If somebody can walk me through i would be internally grateful. > Or even login and help me . > ThanksThe log you sent indicates that the ''bk clone'' command failed.>From looking on google it appears that Red Hat may have distributed aglibc with a slightly incompatible interface. The problem is most liekly that the version of bitkeeper you downloaded or have installed is not compatible with your glibc. Does ''bk version'' tell you anything? Also, the output from ''ldd `which bk`'' and ''ls -l /lib/libc*'' might be useful. -- Keir ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel