Hi all Just wondering if anyone here has seen and/or used LiquidTest[1]? I notice they have Cucumber integration too. Has/would anyone pay for this? (It''s out of the question for me, as there''s no Mac support.) Cheers Ashley [1] http://www.jadeliquid.com/liquidtest/docs/doku.php?id=languages:ruby:home [2] http://www.jadeliquid.com/liquidtest/docs/doku.php?id=languages:ruby:cucumber_story_runner -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran http://aviewfromafar.net/ http://twitter.com/ashleymoran
On 14 Mar 2009, at 21:26, Ashley Moran wrote:> Hi all > > Just wondering if anyone here has seen and/or used LiquidTest[1]? I > notice they have Cucumber integration too. > > Has/would anyone pay for this? (It''s out of the question for me, as > there''s no Mac support.) > > Cheers > Ashley > > [1] http://www.jadeliquid.com/liquidtest/docs/doku.php?id=languages:ruby:home > [2] http://www.jadeliquid.com/liquidtest/docs/doku.php?id=languages:ruby:cucumber_story_runnerPresumably what you''re paying for is all the record / playback rubbish that allows the unqualified to produce brittle test suites. Wouldn''t touch it with a barge pole myself. Still, I''m happy to hear they''re supporting Cucumber. Matt Wynne http://blog.mattwynne.net http://www.songkick.com
On 14 Mar 2009, at 21:51, Matt Wynne wrote:> Presumably what you''re paying for is all the record / playback > rubbish that allows the unqualified to produce brittle test suites. > > Wouldn''t touch it with a barge pole myself.Well that was my initial reaction! Although it does have distributed, headless test runs. But don''t see how this could be used with Cucumber. Can''t see anything it offers that you can''t achieve with free tools! Presumably their main market is waterfall companies that think they can reduce costs by reducing "tester" salaries. Just a guess though... Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran http://aviewfromafar.net/ http://twitter.com/ashleymoran