There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could be offered by the CentOS community. Regards, Vandaman.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:> There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) > and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt > and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, > or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could > be offered by the CentOS community.'Vandaman' -- You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list participant. A non-enumerated list is worse than useless, as it falsely causes concern. So near as I can tell (and I read ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally produced report of all upstream produced updates), you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal your concern. You talk, just to make noise. Some updates in question just showed up today. A couple on the 8th https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0020.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0001.html and a clutch on the 7th Just WHAT do you have in mind? How about you NOT overstep your role? -- Your self-appointed presence as monitor in this list, and of the project are tiresome, not official, and frankly not helpful. You hide behind a throwaway email provider. How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought wanders into your head for two days running? -- Russ herrold
Marko A. Jennings
2009-Jan-12 19:36 UTC
[CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog
On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: <snip>> How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > wanders into your head for two days running?Amen!
Vandaman wrote:> There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) > and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt > and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, > or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? > > If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could > be offered by the CentOS community. > > Regards, > Vandaman. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >how about you doing something to help instead of acting like an emperor..which by the way has no clothes and no throne.
> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could > be offered by the CentOS community.you are either the world's best troll, or a complete moron. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923 www.knossos.net.nz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090113/6bc4d2e9/attachment-0003.sig>
William L. Maltby
2009-Jan-12 19:58 UTC
[CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:36 -0500, Marko A. Jennings wrote:> On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: > <snip> > > How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > > wanders into your head for two days running? > > Amen!s/!/ Brother&/> <snip sig stuff>-- Bill