Qihua Wu
2008-Dec-30 07:44 UTC
[dtrace-discuss] iosnoop doesn''t report IO activity for dd
Hi, All, root at haozhuhost-/export/home/oracle/qihua/DTraceToolkit-0.99/Bin> dd bs=16384 if=/oracle/hao/data01/data01_01.dbf of=/tmp/test1 & [1] 1904 root at haozhuhost-/export/home/oracle/qihua/DTraceToolkit-0.99/Bin> ./iosnoop -f /tmp/test1 UID PID D BLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME 20800+1 records in ===> *didn''t report the IO activity on file /tmp/test1. is it correct?* 20800+1 records out ^C [1]+ Done dd bs=16384 if=/oracle/hao/data01/data01_01.dbf of=/tmp/test1 Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/dtrace-discuss/attachments/20081230/85bddd43/attachment.html>
James Litchfield
2008-Dec-30 20:03 UTC
[dtrace-discuss] iosnoop doesn''t report IO activity for dd
/tmp is almost certainly a memory based file system. iosnoop captures only physical disk IOs which a memory based file system does not do. Jim --- Qihua Wu wrote:> Hi, All, > > root at haozhuhost-/export/home/ > oracle/qihua/DTraceToolkit-0.99/Bin> dd bs=16384 > if=/oracle/hao/data01/data01_01.dbf of=/tmp/test1 & > [1] 1904 > root at haozhuhost-/export/home/oracle/qihua/DTraceToolkit-0.99/Bin> > ./iosnoop -f /tmp/test1 > UID PID D BLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME > 20800+1 records > in > ===> *didn''t report the IO activity on file /tmp/test1. is it correct?* > 20800+1 records out > ^C > > [1]+ Done dd bs=16384 > if=/oracle/hao/data01/data01_01.dbf of=/tmp/test1 > > > Thanks, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > dtrace-discuss mailing list > dtrace-discuss at opensolaris.org >