Virtualization - Jul 2023 - [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix crash on shutdown for when no ndev exists

On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:07:38PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> > The ndev was accessed on shutdown without a check if it actually
exists.
> > This triggered the crash pasted below. This patch simply adds a check
> > before using ndev.
> > 
> > ?BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000300
> > ?#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > ?#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > ?PGD 0 P4D 0
> > ?Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > ?CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 6.5.0-
> > rc2_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_07_17_15_05 #1
> > ?Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-
> > gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> > ?RIP: 0010:mlx5v_shutdown+0xe/0x50 [mlx5_vdpa]
> > ?RSP: 0018:ffff8881003bfdc0 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > ?RAX: ffff888103befba0 RBX: ffff888109d28008 RCX: 0000000000000017
> > ?RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000212 RDI: ffff888109d28000
> > ?RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000d3a3a3882 R09: 0000000000000001
> > ?R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888109d28000
> > ?R13: ffff888109d28080 R14: 00000000fee1dead R15: 0000000000000000
> > ?FS:? 00007f4969e0be40(0000) GS:ffff88852c800000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > ?CS:? 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > ?CR2: 0000000000000300 CR3: 00000001051cd006 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
> > ?DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > ?DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > ?Call Trace:
> > ? <TASK>
> > ? ? __die+0x20/0x60
> > ? ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0
> > ? ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140
> > ? ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> > ? ? mlx5v_shutdown+0xe/0x50 [mlx5_vdpa]
> > ? device_shutdown+0x13e/0x1e0
> > ? kernel_restart+0x36/0x90
> > ? __do_sys_reboot+0x141/0x210
> > ? ? vfs_writev+0xcd/0x140
> > ? ? handle_mm_fault+0x161/0x260
> > ? ? do_writev+0x6b/0x110
> > ? do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
> > ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> > ?RIP: 0033:0x7f496990fb56
> > ?RSP: 002b:00007fffc7bdde88 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
00000000000000a9
> > ?RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f496990fb56
> > ?RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: fffffffffee1dead
> > ?RBP: 00007fffc7bde1d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > ?R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
> > ?R13: 00007fffc7bddf10 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fffc7bde2b8
> > ? </TASK>
> > ?CR2: 0000000000000300
> > ?---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > 
> > Fixes: bc9a2b3e686e ("vdpa/mlx5: Support interrupt
bypassing")
> > Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > ?drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 3 ++-
> > ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > index 9138ef2fb2c8..e2e7ebd71798 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > @@ -3556,7 +3556,8 @@ static void mlx5v_shutdown(struct
auxiliary_device
> > *auxdev)
> > ????????mgtdev = auxiliary_get_drvdata(auxdev);
> > ????????ndev = mgtdev->ndev;
> > ?
> > -???????free_irqs(ndev);
> > +???????if (ndev)
> > +???????????????free_irqs(ndev);
> > ?}
> > ?
> 
> something I don't get:
> irqs are allocated in mlx5_vdpa_dev_add
> why are they not freed in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del?
> 
That is a good point. I will try to find out. I also don't get why free_irq
is
called in the vdpa dev .free op instead of mlx5_vdpa_dev_del. Maybe I can change
that in a different refactoring.
> this is what's creating all this mess.
> 
> 
Not quite: mlx5_vdpa_dev_del (which is a .dev_del of for struct
vdpa_mgmtdev_ops) doesn't get called on shutdown. At least that's what I
see. Or
am I missing something?
> > ?static const struct auxiliary_device_id mlx5v_id_table[] = {
> > -- 
> > 2.41.0
>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:07:38PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> > > The ndev was accessed on shutdown without a check if it actually
exists.
> > > This triggered the crash pasted below. This patch simply adds a
check
> > > before using ndev.
> > > 
> > > ?BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000300
> > > ?#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > > ?#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > > ?PGD 0 P4D 0
> > > ?Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > ?CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 6.5.0-
> > > rc2_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_07_17_15_05 #1
> > > ?Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-
> > > gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> > > ?RIP: 0010:mlx5v_shutdown+0xe/0x50 [mlx5_vdpa]
> > > ?RSP: 0018:ffff8881003bfdc0 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > > ?RAX: ffff888103befba0 RBX: ffff888109d28008 RCX:
0000000000000017
> > > ?RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000212 RDI:
ffff888109d28000
> > > ?RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000d3a3a3882 R09:
0000000000000001
> > > ?R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff888109d28000
> > > ?R13: ffff888109d28080 R14: 00000000fee1dead R15:
0000000000000000
> > > ?FS:? 00007f4969e0be40(0000) GS:ffff88852c800000(0000)
> > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > ?CS:? 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > ?CR2: 0000000000000300 CR3: 00000001051cd006 CR4:
0000000000370eb0
> > > ?DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
> > > ?DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
> > > ?Call Trace:
> > > ? <TASK>
> > > ? ? __die+0x20/0x60
> > > ? ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0
> > > ? ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140
> > > ? ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> > > ? ? mlx5v_shutdown+0xe/0x50 [mlx5_vdpa]
> > > ? device_shutdown+0x13e/0x1e0
> > > ? kernel_restart+0x36/0x90
> > > ? __do_sys_reboot+0x141/0x210
> > > ? ? vfs_writev+0xcd/0x140
> > > ? ? handle_mm_fault+0x161/0x260
> > > ? ? do_writev+0x6b/0x110
> > > ? do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
> > > ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> > > ?RIP: 0033:0x7f496990fb56
> > > ?RSP: 002b:00007fffc7bdde88 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
00000000000000a9
> > > ?RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX:
00007f496990fb56
> > > ?RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI:
fffffffffee1dead
> > > ?RBP: 00007fffc7bde1d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
> > > ?R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
0000000000000000
> > > ?R13: 00007fffc7bddf10 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
00007fffc7bde2b8
> > > ? </TASK>
> > > ?CR2: 0000000000000300
> > > ?---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > 
> > > Fixes: bc9a2b3e686e ("vdpa/mlx5: Support interrupt
bypassing")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea at nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > ?drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 3 ++-
> > > ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > index 9138ef2fb2c8..e2e7ebd71798 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > @@ -3556,7 +3556,8 @@ static void mlx5v_shutdown(struct
auxiliary_device
> > > *auxdev)
> > > ????????mgtdev = auxiliary_get_drvdata(auxdev);
> > > ????????ndev = mgtdev->ndev;
> > > ?
> > > -???????free_irqs(ndev);
> > > +???????if (ndev)
> > > +???????????????free_irqs(ndev);
> > > ?}
> > > ?
> > 
> > something I don't get:
> > irqs are allocated in mlx5_vdpa_dev_add
> > why are they not freed in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del?
> > 
> That is a good point. I will try to find out. I also don't get why
free_irq is
> called in the vdpa dev .free op instead of mlx5_vdpa_dev_del. Maybe I can
change
> that in a different refactoring.
as it is I have no idea whether e.g. ndev can change
between these two call sites. that would make the check
pointless.
> > this is what's creating all this mess.
> > 
> > 
> Not quite: mlx5_vdpa_dev_del (which is a .dev_del of for struct
> vdpa_mgmtdev_ops) doesn't get called on shutdown. At least that's
what I see. Or
> am I missing something?
and why do we care whether irqs are freed on shutdown?
> > > ?static const struct auxiliary_device_id mlx5v_id_table[] = {
> > > -- 
> > > 2.41.0
> > 
>