Le 30 mars 07 ? 20:32, Anton Rang a ?crit :
> Perhaps you should read the QFS documentation and/or source. :-)
I probably should...
> QFS, like
> other write-forward and/or delayed-allocation file systems, does
> not incur a
> seek per I/O. For sequential writes in a typical data capture
> application,
> there are no seeks at all (save for those required to move
> sequentially).
Then the gains from giant I/O size should not be that large (do we
have number here ? are we talking small % points)
unless the I/O scheduler is less efficient than ZFS''
-r