On Jan 01 00:05:09, jamie at catflap.org wrote:> Jan Stary via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31 11:43:56, paul at nohats.ca wrote:
> > > Why not go to xml and use xml2man / pandoc ?
> >
> > Because it is a terrible manpage format
> > and the toolchain produces broken crap.
>
> I have no specific knowledge on this, but would just like to "me
too"
> to this thread that whatever format is used, it MUSTN'T impact on the
> quality of any resultant man/mdoc conversion.
What I am proposing is to _write_ the mdoc(7) manpages,
not have them produced by some toolchain or another.
> </bikeshed>
I am concerned that you consider the quality of documentation bikeshiding.