Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xml2man".
Did you mean:
mlyman
2023 Jan 02
2
rewrite manpages to mdoc(7)
On Jan 01 00:05:09, jamie at catflap.org wrote:
> Jan Stary via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31 11:43:56, paul at nohats.ca wrote:
> > > Why not go to xml and use xml2man / pandoc ?
> >
> > Because it is a terrible manpage format
> > and the toolchain produces broken crap.
>
> I have no specific knowledge on this, but would just like to "me too"
> to this thread that whatever format is used, it MUSTN'T impact on the
> qua...
2023 Jan 10
1
rewrite manpages to mdoc(7)
Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> wrote:
> On Jan 01 00:05:09, jamie at catflap.org wrote:
> > Jan Stary via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 31 11:43:56, paul at nohats.ca wrote:
> > > > Why not go to xml and use xml2man / pandoc ?
> > >
> > > Because it is a terrible manpage format
> > > and the toolchain produces broken crap.
> >
> > I have no specific knowledge on this, but would just like to "me too"
> > to this thread that whatever format is used, it MUST...
2022 Dec 31
1
rewrite manpages to mdoc(7)
Dear authors of NSD,
currently, the manpages that come with NSD
are written in the traditional man(7) markup language.
I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup
of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work.
See a version of nsd-checkzone.8 below as an example.
Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades,
and are supported by the prevalent formatters: