Indeed, thanks Florian!
Thanks for all other suggestions too!
Haven't read the whole thread yet, but I do like to point out it's not
lack of interest.
Wouter makes an excellent point that I hadn't considered yet.
Portability and compatibility. I don't know if we still have Solaris
users, so I don't know if it'd make their lives harder.
One thing I did think of after my response is that if dependencies are
changed, we probably want to wait for the next minor (major?) version?
I feel we shouldn't make the lives of package maintainers harder by
swapping dependencies in a patch version.
I'll need to read up on possible tooling etc first to determine what
makes sense.
- Jeroen
On Sat, 2022-12-31 at 20:13 +0100, Jan Stary via nsd-users
wrote:> On Dec 31 18:24:42, nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl?wrote:
> > This was discussed in 2015:
> > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/2015-August/002167.html
>
> Ah, thanks for reminding me :-)
>
> I just read the whole thread (please do as well)
> - AFAICT it led nowhere for lack of interest.
>
> The only valid point I see there is that Solaris
> does not have a formatter for the mdoc(7) language,
> which I find hard to beliave (doesn't Solaris have groff?).
> But surely that's a moot point now.
>
> ????????Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsd-users mailing list
> nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl
> https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users