Does anyone have comments on the new wording here? Suggested: The Title field should be in title case. Current version is: (xxx) In title case this would be: (Xxx) Hoping R core will see this here and magically adopt it, otherwise I'll try posting it to the r bugs site ... ==================================================================--- src/library/tools/R/QC.R (revision 74551) +++ src/library/tools/R/QC.R (working copy) @@ -7727,8 +7727,10 @@ "The Title field starts with the package name." }, if(length(y <- x$title_case)) { - paste(c("The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:", - sQuote(y)), + paste(c("The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:", + sQuote(y[1]), + "In title case this would be:", + sQuote(y[2])), collapse = "\n") })), fmt(c(if(length(x$descr_bad_initial)) {
Any follow-up/comments on this? If I don't hear back I'll submit to r-bugs so it doesn't get lost ... (Don't see any changes in QC.R in the last few days ... https://github.com/wch/r-source/commits/trunk/src/library/tools/R/QC.R ) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:45 PM Subject: suggested patch for messages To: r-devel at r-project.org Does anyone have comments on the new wording here? Suggested: The Title field should be in title case. Current version is: (xxx) In title case this would be: (Xxx) Hoping R core will see this here and magically adopt it, otherwise I'll try posting it to the r bugs site ... ==================================================================--- src/library/tools/R/QC.R (revision 74551) +++ src/library/tools/R/QC.R (working copy) @@ -7727,8 +7727,10 @@ "The Title field starts with the package name." }, if(length(y <- x$title_case)) { - paste(c("The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:", - sQuote(y)), + paste(c("The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:", + sQuote(y[1]), + "In title case this would be:", + sQuote(y[2])), collapse = "\n") })), fmt(c(if(length(x$descr_bad_initial)) {
>>>>> Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> >>>>> on Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:42:10 -0400 writes:> Any follow-up/comments on this? If I don't hear back I'll submit to > r-bugs so it doesn't get lost ... > (Don't see any changes in QC.R in the last few days ... > https://github.com/wch/r-source/commits/trunk/src/library/tools/R/QC.R > ) Thank you, Ben, for the proposal and the reminder. I agree that the message after the change is much easier to understand, notably for people like me who are not proficient in style of the Queen's English. I've committed a change (74593) to R-devel where I've slightly simplified the wording from "this would be:" to "that is:" and really I cannot give a rational reason why I also changed "this" to "that" so I'm open for another tweak from people with better English style proficiency.. Martin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:45 PM Subject: suggested patch for messages To: r-devel at r-project.org Does anyone have comments on the new wording here? Suggested: The Title field should be in title case. Current version is: (xxx) In title case this would be: (Xxx) Hoping R core will see this here and magically adopt it, otherwise I'll try posting it to the r bugs site ... ==================================================================--- src/library/tools/R/QC.R (revision 74551) +++ src/library/tools/R/QC.R (working copy) @@ -7727,8 +7727,10 @@ "The Title field starts with the package name." }, if(length(y <- x$title_case)) { - paste(c("The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:", - sQuote(y)), + paste(c("The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:", + sQuote(y[1]), + "In title case this would be:", + sQuote(y[2])), collapse = "\n") })), fmt(c(if(length(x$descr_bad_initial)) {
Reasonably Related Threads
- Suggested Patch: Adding commas to list of packages after R CMD check
- Suggested Patch: Adding commas to list of packages after R CMD check
- Stale link from ?check to R Internals
- Suggested Patch: Library returns matching installed packages when typo present
- Improvements to write.arff (PR#12574)