Michel van Dop
2019-Apr-12 07:30 UTC
[Icecast] players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
Hi, We use Icecast version 2.4.4 and use mountpoint /main and include use fallback-mount. When the /main is offline 92% of the listeners go to fallback-mount and 8% disconnect. The format is 96k AAC and we have 8 mountpoint and 8 fallback-mount points include extra fallback files AAC. Are there any players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point? Best regards, Michel -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20190412/787f82e8/attachment.html>
Paul Martin
2019-Apr-12 09:13 UTC
[Icecast] players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:30:11AM +0200, Michel van Dop wrote:> We use Icecast version 2.4.4 and use mountpoint /main and include use > fallback-mount. > When the /main is offline 92% of the listeners go to fallback-mount and > 8% disconnect. > > The format is 96k AAC and we have 8 mountpoint and 8 fallback-mount > points include extra fallback files AAC.Are the fallback streams exactly the same characteristics as the streams they're associated with? Are they live or are they files served by Icecast? (File serving is not bitrate constrained in mainstream Icecast, so will completely fill listeners' players' buffers, possibily requiring a reconnect to get back to live if the buffer is large.) -- Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk>
Michel van Dop
2019-Apr-12 09:38 UTC
[Icecast] players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
Hi Paul, Thanks for the quick response! We use the same type of encoder (Sam Cast) both live for both mountpoints on 96 Kb Joint Stereo. it is difficult to see if it is exactly the same. Is there a player that show exactly this? I will check this. We have use the limit-rate in our config. Thats work better for go to play the last fallback-mount file (i test this). See here our part of the config: <mount> <mount-name>/aac</mount-name> <password>xxxxxxx</password> <public>1</public> <hidden>0</hidden> <limit-rate>96k</limit-rate> <fallback-mount>/fk-aac</fallback-mount> <fallback-override>1</fallback-override> <max-listeners>1500</max-listeners> </mount> <mount> <mount-name>/fk-aac</mount-name> <password>xxxxxxx</password> <public>1</public> <hidden>1</hidden> <limit-rate>96k</limit-rate> <fallback-mount>/aac.aac</fallback-mount> <fallback-override>1</fallback-override> <max-listeners>1500</max-listeners> </mount> Best regards, Michel Paul Martin schreef op 2019-04-12 11:13:> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:30:11AM +0200, Michel van Dop wrote: > >> We use Icecast version 2.4.4 and use mountpoint /main and include use >> fallback-mount. >> When the /main is offline 92% of the listeners go to fallback-mount >> and >> 8% disconnect. >> >> The format is 96k AAC and we have 8 mountpoint and 8 fallback-mount >> points include extra fallback files AAC. > > Are the fallback streams exactly the same characteristics as the > streams they're associated with? > > Are they live or are they files served by Icecast? (File serving is > not bitrate constrained in mainstream Icecast, so will completely fill > listeners' players' buffers, possibily requiring a reconnect to get > back to live if the buffer is large.)--
MPG Radio
2019-Apr-13 16:04 UTC
[Icecast] players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
We use Icecast & ezestream, 128 and 44100 mp3 with a hybrid player HTML and flash, as long as we keep to the exact settings defined in the configuration, we have success. no drop outs etc.....that we are aware of. We are using win buss vista 64 if you can believe that... Thank you Mike Gagne, Program / Music Director *MPG Radio *|* BandFan | *bandfanforum at gmail.com Founded in 2012, MPGRadio is a self-supported Internet station committed to providing a venue for fans of music artists alike to share compositions of any genre. facebook <https://www.facebook.com/mpgradio/> | twitter <https://twitter.com/mpgrecord> | instagram <https://www.instagram.com/mpgradio/> | google+ <https://plus.google.com/b/114999516585539219574/114999516585539219574?hl=en-GB> | Support <https://teespring.com/stores/mpg-radio-support> "Get on our Crypto Nero <https://choon.co/playlists/0zff9rczvfu> playlist" - with Choon, a streaming service and digital payments ecosystem. Artists we rotate can be fast-tracked avoiding the waiting list. *24 hour commercial-free internet-only radio station* We are a listener-supported, commercial-free internet-only radio station with no advertising or annoying commercial interruptions. Our mission is to search out and expose great new music to people who otherwise may never encounter it. A tremendous amount of work is put in by volunteers on this internet radio station to develop new programming and to ensure that everyone Artist gets fair exposure support this effort <https://teespring.com/stores/mpg-radio-support>. Please visit us at: MPGRadio <http://mpg.dnset.com/radio> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:30 AM Michel van Dop <mvandop at xs4all.nl> wrote:> Hi, > > We use Icecast version 2.4.4 and use mountpoint /main and include use > fallback-mount. > When the /main is offline 92% of the listeners go to fallback-mount and 8% > disconnect. > > The format is 96k AAC and we have 8 mountpoint and 8 fallback-mount points > include extra fallback files AAC. > > Are there any players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount > point? > > Best regards, > Michel > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20190413/42da37bb/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Windows Source Client
- players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
- players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
- players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
- players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?