I'm using KH branch, into production, and work amazing well, with the latest change into the Worker manager, one server can handle 25k concurrent users with 8 cores, using nothing of ram... really the KH branch work amazing well. 2012/7/8 R?cker Thomas <thomas.ruecker at tieto.com>> On 08/07/12 18:21, Paul Martin wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:15:52AM +0300, R?cker Thomas wrote: > >> On 07/07/12 23:54, ohio?fm wrote: > >>> Hello! When will the 2.3.3 update get kicked over to apt-get? Also, > >> That's up to the debian maintainers of icecast not us. > >> Please ask them. I have done so myself (see debian bug 652663), > >> but not received an update for a while. > > Use the source: > > > > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main non-free > > > > That has 2.3.3kh1-dmo1. > > I would strongly advise against putting a KH build to production use. > That's Karl's experimental branch. > > How that ended up in debian-multimedia is beyond me. > > Cheers > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20120708/9ac97c5f/attachment.htm
On 08/07/12 20:42, Alejandro wrote:> I'm using KH branch, into production, and work amazing well, with the > latest change into the Worker manager, one server can handle 25k > concurrent users with 8 cores, using nothing of ram... really the KH > branch work amazing well. > > 2012/7/8 R?cker Thomas <thomas.ruecker at tieto.com > <mailto:thomas.ruecker at tieto.com>> > > On 08/07/12 18:21, Paul Martin wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:15:52AM +0300, R?cker Thomas wrote: > >> On 07/07/12 23:54, ohio?fm wrote: > >>> Hello! When will the 2.3.3 update get kicked over to apt-get? > Also, > >> That's up to the debian maintainers of icecast not us. > >> Please ask them. I have done so myself (see debian bug 652663), > >> but not received an update for a while. > > Use the source: > > > > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main non-free > > > > That has 2.3.3kh1-dmo1. > > I would strongly advise against putting a KH build to production use. > That's Karl's experimental branch. > > How that ended up in debian-multimedia is beyond me. >It sees far less testing and review than mainline. The other day we had someone for whom Icecast suddenly started crashing. Turned out it was a kh build. That said I do hope to see many useful features from the kh branch arrive in mainline over time. Thomas PS: You might want to turn off HTML mails for posting to mailing lists and learn to quote.
Le 08/07/2012 19:50, R?cker Thomas a ?crit :> It sees far less testing and review than mainline. > The other day we had someone for whom Icecast suddenly started crashing. > Turned out it was a kh build.I'll pipe in. The company I work for has 1000+ audio (and some video) streams, serving tens of thousands of listeners per stream, running on both icecast and icecast-kh and _both_ have _huge_ race conditions. We experience many crashes per day on the 50+ servers we have in production. Last year, Laurent Defert, a colleague of mine had opened several trac tickets with patches to fix race conditions found using Hellgrind (a close relative of memcheck, the main Valgrind tool). I can only encourage the Icecast community to look at those patches (though they were done for the "regular" icecast, the same exercise can and _should_ be done for icecast-kh). Cheers, R?mi PS, if anyone has any questions, I'm almost always available on FreeNode as remi` (with the backtick) or as remi|work.