search for: defert

hi list, oh it''s not really a problem. Each time i fire shorewall, i run a custom iptables script: (for the openvpn machines to have route back from my bridge/fw - $SOURCEIP is the ip of my OpenVPN/Fw/bridge) iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 10.8.0.0/16 -j SNAT --to-source $SOURCEIP i wish to better integrate it within shorewall, so is there any config files that could achieve the

hi list! i'm trying to find a convenient way to build a redundant filtering bridge under linux i looked at carp project, but carp doesn't support bridge now i thing the most appropriate way is using stp or rstp it seems that 2.6 kernel supports stp but what about rstp? I read some docs about stp, but they are rather outdated (2001 and kernel 2.2) there are several problems indeed: *

...pe in. The company I work for has 1000+ audio (and some video) streams, serving tens of thousands of listeners per stream, running on both icecast and icecast-kh and _both_ have _huge_ race conditions. We experience many crashes per day on the 50+ servers we have in production. Last year, Laurent Defert, a colleague of mine had opened several trac tickets with patches to fix race conditions found using Hellgrind (a close relative of memcheck, the main Valgrind tool). I can only encourage the Icecast community to look at those patches (though they were done for the "regular" icecast, the...

hi list, i got a small problem. here is my setup: WAN | | | bridged $FW-------DMZ | | masqueraded | LOCAL my shorewall machine ($FW) got three interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 * eth0 is connected to the WAN * eth1 is connected to my DMZ * eth2 is connected to LOCAL network i manage a whole C class (public adresses) in my DMZ, let''s say X.Y.Z.0/24 * my router

...on both icecast and > icecast-kh and _both_ have _huge_ race conditions. We experience many > crashes per day on the 50+ servers we have in production. Why have you not filed bugs about it then? Outlining the gravity of the problem? Or at least brought it up on IRC. > Last year, Laurent Defert, a colleague of mine had opened several trac > tickets with patches to fix race conditions found using Hellgrind (a > close relative of memcheck, the main Valgrind tool). I suspect you mean https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1810 The ticket does not suggest that those are in any way proven and gra...

I'm using KH branch, into production, and work amazing well, with the latest change into the Worker manager, one server can handle 25k concurrent users with 8 cores, using nothing of ram... really the KH branch work amazing well. 2012/7/8 R?cker Thomas <thomas.ruecker at tieto.com> > On 08/07/12 18:21, Paul Martin wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:15:52AM +0300, R?cker

Hi, I''m running mldonkey on same box as shorewall. I follow this http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/ShorewallConfiguration to open ports for edonkey protocol I add in /etc/shorewall/rules: # eDonkey 2000 ACCEPT net $FW tcp 4662 ACCEPT net $FW udp 4666 but I could not connect to any edonkey server. I check logs and notice that udp traffic on port 4666 is still dropped. Jul 8 22:35:57

hi list, any idea how i can transcribe this simple iptables script to shorewall config? wich files should be modified ? iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 10.8.0.0/16 -j SNAT --to-source $SOURCEIP

Hi list, is it possible to simply authenticate users against a LDAP MacOSX server. The samba service runs on a Linux server The LDAP service runs on MacOSX server I want the samba users to be authenticated through samba-ldap, MacOSX hosts the LDAP server. I don't want the Linux Samba server to add/modify any group/account on LDAP. I don't want the Samba server to be primary controler,