Hi J,>Hi David, >Do you know of a flash player that works for icecast and IE7?Whilst I've never used the software myself I came across Wimpy via the Icecast forum: http://forum.icecast.org/viewtopic.php?p=2822& You may want to give it a try.>jRegards, David>-----Original Message----- >From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf >Of davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:49 AM >To: icecast@xiph.org >Subject: Re: [Icecast] Server Requirements > >Hi Chip, > >>hi david > >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and want >to >>> use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements are >over >>> 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 >machines >>> but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your >experiences >>> and suggestions. >> >>this is probably of some tangential relevance: >> >>http://www.icecast.org/loadtest1.php > >Thanks for the link I will have a good look through. At first glance it's >looking impressive. > >>Oddsock tested up to 14,000 concurrent users - but it was only >>listeners that were tested for. it would be great to see another test >>to simulate concurrent encoders and listeners. > >Am I right in thinking when using the likes of SAM, Oddcast, Simplecastthe>encoding is done clientside? Under what circumstance would the encodingload>be server-side? On-demand delivery? > >>anyway, Icecast appears to scale very nicely. > >It looks that way. > >>cheers >> >>Chip > >Thanks, >David > >___________________________________________________________ > >Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! >http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ > > >_______________________________________________ >Icecast mailing list >Icecast@xiph.org >http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >___________________________________________________________ Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/
davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk wrote:> Hi J, > > >> Hi David, >> Do you know of a flash player that works for icecast and IE7? >> > > Whilst I've never used the software myself I came across Wimpy via the Icecast > forum: > http://forum.icecast.org/viewtopic.php?p=2822& > > You may want to give it a try. > >I'm currently having major issues with wimpy and IE7. Issues such as - it doesn't work. if anybody else has seen similar issues with wimpy - and has found a solution, please let me know the secret! Matt>> j >> > > Regards, > David > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf >> Of davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:49 AM >> To: icecast@xiph.org >> Subject: Re: [Icecast] Server Requirements >> >> Hi Chip, >> >> >>> hi david >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and want >>>> >> to >> >>>> use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements are >>>> >> over >> >>>> 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 >>>> >> machines >> >>>> but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your >>>> >> experiences >> >>>> and suggestions. >>>> >>> this is probably of some tangential relevance: >>> >>> http://www.icecast.org/loadtest1.php >>> >> Thanks for the link I will have a good look through. At first glance it's >> looking impressive. >> >> >>> Oddsock tested up to 14,000 concurrent users - but it was only >>> listeners that were tested for. it would be great to see another test >>> to simulate concurrent encoders and listeners. >>> >> Am I right in thinking when using the likes of SAM, Oddcast, Simplecast >> > the > >> encoding is done clientside? Under what circumstance would the encoding >> > load > >> be server-side? On-demand delivery? >> >> >>> anyway, Icecast appears to scale very nicely. >>> >> It looks that way. >> >> >>> cheers >>> >>> Chip >>> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> >> Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! >> http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Icecast mailing list >> Icecast@xiph.org >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >> >> > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! > http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >
Hi All The "Minicaster" is a flash player that works perfectly with Icecast2 Servers, but besides of that, it's not-so-sophisticated (meaning there isn't any configuration on the GUI whatsoever) Give it a try: http://christmasradio.fm -Alex -----Original Message----- From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Lamb Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 09:24 To: davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk Cc: icecast@xiph.org Subject: Re: FW: [Icecast] Server Requirements davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk wrote:> Hi J, > > >> Hi David, >> Do you know of a flash player that works for icecast and IE7? >> > > Whilst I've never used the software myself I came across Wimpy via the > Icecast > forum: > http://forum.icecast.org/viewtopic.php?p=2822& > > You may want to give it a try. > >I'm currently having major issues with wimpy and IE7. Issues such as - it doesn't work. if anybody else has seen similar issues with wimpy - and has found a solution, please let me know the secret! Matt>> j >> > > Regards, > David > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On >> Behalf Of davidhooper@tiscali.co.uk >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:49 AM >> To: icecast@xiph.org >> Subject: Re: [Icecast] Server Requirements >> >> Hi Chip, >> >> >>> hi david >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and >>>> want >>>> >> to >> >>>> use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements >>>> are >>>> >> over >> >>>> 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 >>>> >> machines >> >>>> but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your >>>> >> experiences >> >>>> and suggestions. >>>> >>> this is probably of some tangential relevance: >>> >>> http://www.icecast.org/loadtest1.php >>> >> Thanks for the link I will have a good look through. At first glance >> it's looking impressive. >> >> >>> Oddsock tested up to 14,000 concurrent users - but it was only >>> listeners that were tested for. it would be great to see another >>> test to simulate concurrent encoders and listeners. >>> >> Am I right in thinking when using the likes of SAM, Oddcast, >> Simplecast >> > the > >> encoding is done clientside? Under what circumstance would the >> encoding >> > load > >> be server-side? On-demand delivery? >> >> >>> anyway, Icecast appears to scale very nicely. >>> >> It looks that way. >> >> >>> cheers >>> >>> Chip >>> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> >> Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! >> http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Icecast mailing list >> Icecast@xiph.org >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >> >> > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Tiscali Broadband only 9.99 a month for your first 3 months! > http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >_______________________________________________ Icecast mailing list Icecast@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast