Rethinking to BER in UMTS, it seems acceptable to use speex on it
do you agree?
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: marzullo maio <marzullo63@yahoo.it>
A: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org
Inviato: Sabato 5 maggio 2007, 23:06:40
Oggetto: Re: [Speex-dev] AMR vs Speex on wireless networks.
NB for CSD/HSCSD and WB for UMTS/HSDPA.
The UMTS/HSDPA services already provides an
excellent turbo code correction.
For what i know i can tell you more about corrupted packets.
The BER ranges from 10^-5 to 10^-2 for CSD/HSCDS
in transparent mode, and from 10^-9 to 10^-6 for
UMTS/HSDPA.
It depends on signal quality and if you're
walking/standing or if you're in real mobility
(for example talking while driving a car), etc...
So it depends. For example, if it is raining, the water
causes lots of refletions and rises the BER.
Rural environments has less BER than urban ones.
In order to undestand your 4 points i suppose i need
to study CELP becouse i'm not understanding right now.
Have you
other suggestions given these informations?
Thanks.
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo!
Mail_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
___________________________________
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail:
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070505/aa9a9ab4/attachment.html
