If you are interested in helping with testing new features, please look at http://shorewall.net/netmap.html. If you have a need for this type of network-level address mapping and/or are in a position to test it please let me know. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Tom; I am prepaired to do some testing of NETMAP. I should be able to start early next week. Steven. On Friday 19 March 2004 01:17, Tom Eastep wrote:> If you are interested in helping with testing new features, please look > at http://shorewall.net/netmap.html. If you have a need for this type of > network-level address mapping and/or are in a position to test it please > let me know. > > -Tom
Steven Jan Springl wrote:> I am prepaired to do some testing of NETMAP. I should be able to > start early next week. >Thanks Steven! I will only be able to do very rudimentary testing here. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Unfortunately it probably won''t be any more comprehensive here either due to the limited amount of equipment I have at home. I could do a more comprehensive test at work, but that would have to be out of normal working hours, and therefore would probably take many days. Is there any time frame in which would like the testing to be completed? Steven On Sunday 21 March 2004 00:43, Tom Eastep wrote:> Steven Jan Springl wrote: > > I am prepaired to do some testing of NETMAP. I should be able to > > start early next week. > > Thanks Steven! I will only be able to do very rudimentary testing here. > > -Tom
Steven Jan Springl wrote:> Unfortunately it probably won''t be any more comprehensive here either due to > the limited amount of equipment I have at home. > I could do a more comprehensive test at work, but that would have to be out of > normal working hours, and therefore would probably take many days. Is there > any time frame in which would like the testing to be completed?I won''t release 2.0.1 until after 4/1. I suspect that NETMAP probably won''t be *really* tested until a user is willing to try it on a a network. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 20:08, Tom Eastep wrote:> > I suspect that NETMAP probably won''t be *really* tested until a user is > willing to try it on a a network. > > -TomTom, Define Network ?? how many hosts and what type .. ?? BTW .. I think ISS (Black Ice) stock is gonna take a nosedive on Monday .. :-) Francesca -- "No Problems Only Solutions" Lady Linux Internet Services Baltimore, MD 21217
Francesca C. Smith wrote:> > Define Network ?? how many hosts and what type .. ?? >I would think that the minimum credible test would need a /29 -- host types aren''t really relevant.> BTW .. I think ISS (Black Ice) stock is gonna take a nosedive on Monday > .. :-)What a "witty" observation..... :) -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bug 1339] New: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
- [Bug 1070] New: NETMAP "to" address is not separated from previous output while listing NAT rules
- [Bug 1337] New: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
- netmap feature request
- New Document on Shorewall Website