Thanks for the response, Jim, you told me most of what I needed to know.> For very tight bandwidth applications speex is probably better, > if you have the cpu.Well, heh, I'm not sure if an ARM running at ~200mHz - with a fair amount of other stuff to do at the same time - really qualifies as "enough CPU." Is there sort of a rule of thumb for how much gumption a chip needs, in order to pull this off? For that matter, is there such a rule of thumb for iLBC? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
>>>>> "John" == John Haugeland <JohnH@senscom.com> writes:John> Thanks for the response, Jim, you told me most of what I needed John> to know.>> For very tight bandwidth applications speex is probably better, >> if you have the cpu.John> Is there sort of a rule of thumb for how much gumption a chip John> needs, in order to pull this off? John> For that matter, is there such a rule of thumb for iLBC? Jean-Marc's reply covered what speex needs; for iLBC I can only say that I think I recall that it takes less than g729a, and the latter is supported on the zaurus (200MHz strongarm).... Once converted to fixed I'm sure speex will be fine on strong arm and intel's newer stuff based on that (pxa?). It might even work on the arm940 (12MHz); if so that chip should be enough for an IP phone with 711/rgl/ilbc/gsm/speex support. I would love to see a 802.11 phone like that, complete with a tiny price. :) -JimC --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.