amit kumar
2017-Apr-30 15:25 UTC
[Samba] NAS SMB server not accepting packets > 65k size. Does SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536 Matters?
Hello,
This is situation:
* [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]*
| =SMB 2/3= |
| sending
data>65k Fail
| sending
data<65k Passes
Max Write/Read Size[65535]
*From Packet Captures*:
1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message:
NAS returned STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED & RHEL client drops the transaction.
Though these are filters on NAS Server:
NAS_Server::*> vserver cifs options show
...
Max Buffer Size for SMB1 Message: 65535
SMB2 Enabled: true
SMB3 Enabled: true
WINS Servers:
2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536,
Max_Read_Size = 65536
*[Windows SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]*
| =SMB 2/3= |
| sending data>65k
Passes Max Write/Read Size[8388608]
*From Packet Captures*:
1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message:
Win12 returned STATUS_SUCCESS
2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 8388608,
Max_Read_Size = 8388608
* **[RHEL SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]*
| =SMB 2/3= |
| sending data>65k
Passes
Max Write/Read Size[8388608]
*From Packet Captures*:
1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message:
RHEL returned STATUS_SUCCESS
2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 8388608,
Max_Read_Size = 8388608
My queries:
1. Can server accept/send more than 65K sized packet, if
SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536, Max_Read_Size
= 65536?
Again, on NAS, On cifs-mounted shares packets > 65k succeed to get
transferred..
2. If SMB-server sends STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED for
FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO, Is it expected to carry the transaction
further?
--
Thanks
Amit Kumar
!!If you stumble, get back up.
What happened yesterday, no longer matters.
Today is another day to move closer to your GOAL!!
Saji VR
2017-Apr-30 15:44 UTC
[Samba] NAS SMB server not accepting packets > 65k size. Does SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536 Matters?
>1. Can server accept/send more than 65K sized packet, if >SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536, Max_Read_Size >= 65536?That dictates the max read/write size supported by server, client is expected to honor that. So answer is No. NetApp filer does not support reads/write larger than 64K>2. If SMB-server sends STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED for >FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO, Is it expected to carry the transaction >further?Yes, Only requirement is the response has to be signed, which assures that the response is coming from the server itself. On 4/30/17, 8:25 AM, "samba-technical on behalf of amit kumar via samba-technical" <samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org on behalf of samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote: Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535] *From Packet Captures*: 1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message: NAS returned STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED & RHEL client drops the transaction. Though these are filters on NAS Server: NAS_Server::*> vserver cifs options show ... Max Buffer Size for SMB1 Message: 65535 SMB2 Enabled: true SMB3 Enabled: true WINS Servers: 2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536, Max_Read_Size = 65536 *[Windows SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[8388608] *From Packet Captures*: 1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message: Win12 returned STATUS_SUCCESS 2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 8388608, Max_Read_Size = 8388608 * **[RHEL SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[8388608] *From Packet Captures*: 1. For FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO message: RHEL returned STATUS_SUCCESS 2. SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 8388608, Max_Read_Size = 8388608 My queries: 1. Can server accept/send more than 65K sized packet, if SMB2->Negotiate_Protocol_Response->Max_Write_Size = 65536, Max_Read_Size = 65536? Again, on NAS, On cifs-mounted shares packets > 65k succeed to get transferred.. 2. If SMB-server sends STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED for FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO, Is it expected to carry the transaction further? -- Thanks Amit Kumar !!If you stumble, get back up. What happened yesterday, no longer matters. Today is another day to move closer to your GOAL!!