A couple of weeks ago, I asked for help with getting tinc to work with a
couple of issues. I prioritize my hobby projects below essential
things, and I'm a bit scatterbrained when there's an internet
connection, so it took awhile before I finished trying the things you
suggested, and got to a point where I was stuck again. Thanks for
taking the time to answer my questions!
I set the "*NdisDeviceType" property on the TAP device of my laptop
and
the desktop. On both of them, the "Unidentified Network" disappeared
from the network list. I can still ping the other machines on the VPN,
and Windows Firewall is no longer misbehaving. If someone else has this
problem, point him to
http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/10/30/unidentified-network-issue-with-vmwares-virtual-nics-in-vista/
It explains what to do more clearly, if you're doing it by hand. The
link you gave
(http://nivot.org/blog/post/2008/09/05/VMWareVMNETAdaptersTriggeringPublicProfileForWindowsFirewall)
provides the script, but didn't explain well enough what was going on
for me to understand it.
I found out where I got the term "WAN loopback". The Wikipedia
article
on NAT has a section on "NAT loopback".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation#NAT_loopback
Your WinIPBroadcast program works great.
You asked which version of tinc I'm using:
Windows: 1.0.24
Linux: 1.0.23
Is tinc 1.1 now stable enough that any problems I'd encounter are most
likely of my own doing, rather than bugs in tinc?
I ran into 2 problems that are most likely caused by Age of Empires III,
but I wanted to run it by you in case I could solve them on the network
side.
I can ping the desktop and the laptop from each other, over the VPN.
AoE3 on the desktop decided to use the VPN for LAN gaming, while the
laptop chose the LAN. On both, I prioritized the LAN adapters over the
VPN. If I use an obscure trick
(http://www.tunngle.net/wiki/Network:Age_of_Empires_III:_Age_of_Discovery),
I can force AoE3 on each machine to use whichever address I want. But
they don't see each other over the VPN, and I can't use direct IP.
Wireshark says that there is a small stream of UDP packets going between
them, and I'm pretty sure that these are part of the game. It appears
that each machine will sometimes respond to the other. The most useful
info I found (in my opinion) is that when I tried to do LAN gaming with
a second desktop, with the VPN turned off, 1 of the machines was sending
ICMP port unavailable errors in response to each UDP packet.
Can you make sense of these symptoms?
Etienne Dechamps wrote:> Hi Erik,
>
> On 2 April 2015 at 21:05, Erik Popp<epopp at i2pmail.org> wrote:
>> Windows Firewall doesn't know where the center of my VPN is. This
is
>> because I intentionally didn't make one. Thus, my Windows boxes
call it
>> "Unidentified Network", and assign it to the restrictive
settings for public
>> networks.
>> If I tell Windows that 1 or more of the machines on the VPN is a
default
>> gateway, it recognizes the network, but only if that machine was up
when the
>> Windows box connected to the network. Also, Windows gives me a warning
that
>> setting multiple default gateways is meant for multiple connections to
a
>> single network, not separate connections to separate networks. I
currently
>> want the VPN to be separate from either physical LAN.
> Yes, this is a known issue, and unfortunately this is a Windows
> limitation - its NLA (Network Location Awareness) feature is not
> designed for virtual peer-to-peer networks at all.
>
> There are only two ways (that I know of) to fix the "Unidentified
> network" label (as well as the firewall settings):
>
> - Make sure one node is always up, and then configure that machine as
> default gateway, making sure to set appropriate route metrics so that
> it will never get priority over your physical network. It seems like
> this is not an option for your use case.
>
> - Apply a registry hack to make Windows see the virtual network
> adapter as an "endpoint" device. This will fix the firewall
settings,
> and it will also make the VPN disappear entirely from the network list
> (but not the adapter list). This is described at
>
http://nivot.org/blog/post/2008/09/05/VMWareVMNETAdaptersTriggeringPublicProfileForWindowsFirewall
>
> Here's more discussion about this issue in general:
>
http://serverfault.com/questions/60794/windows-7-network-connection-with-no-default-gateway-any-way-to-change-the-un
>
>> At my grandparents' house, tinc's local peer discovery
doesn't work
>> properly. They don't discover each other on the network unless
they can
>> both talk to a third machine over the internet, and then they can route
>> traffic through each other via the third machine. If I have 1 or both
of
>> them ping each other for awhile (a few seconds to several minutes),
they'll
>> discover each others' local addresses for sending data, but they
appear to
>> still use their remote peer for the meta connection. The router which
local
>> peer discovery has WAN loopback (incorrect term?) enabled, so I can SSH
into
>> the router using its WAN IP, from inside its LAN.
> LocalDiscovery is only about optimizing the path for UDP data packets.
> It does not affect metaconnections, though that's an interesting idea
> for a feature request.
>
> The main use case for LocalDiscovery is to avoid sending large amounts
> of data over the Internet when the two nodes happen to be on the same
> LAN; it's not designed to establish new metaconnection edges, and will
> not protect against the link between the LAN and the Internet going
> down.
>
> You didn't mention which tinc version you're using. If you're
making
> heavy use of LocalDiscovery, you might want to use 1.1pre11 or later,
> as the local discovery process was significantly improved in that
> version:https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/26
>
> By the way, the correct term for what you refer to as "WAN
loopback"
> is "hairpinning":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairpinning
>
>> When the tinc daemon/service is turned on, it breaks LAN gaming on Age
of
>> Empires III, for that machine. I suspect that this is a firewall
issue. I
>> can't see any games that are being hosted on the LAN. If I try to
connect
>> with a direct IP, it seems that messages are getting to 1 of them, but
2-way
>> communication doesn't work.
> It could indeed be related to the firewall going back to the
> restricted profile when the virtual adapter is connected to an
> "Unidentified network", as explained above. Here's another
> possibility:
>
> On Windows, global broadcast packets (which is probably what's used by
> your game to discover lobbies) are by default only sent over one
> interface. What might be happening is that the packets are being sent
> over the VPN instead of the physical network. There are two solutions
> for this:
>
> - Change the adapter priority (in Adapter Settings > Advanced >
> Advanced Settings > Adapters and Bindings tab) so that your physical
> adapter has higher priority compared to the virtual adapter, ensuring
> that broadcast packets get sent on the correct interface.
>
> - Simply install WinIPBroadcast to ensure these packets are sent over
> all network adapters, thereby solving the issue once and for all:
> https://github.com/dechamps/WinIPBroadcast
>
> Here's more discussion about the broadcast issue in general:
>
http://serverfault.com/questions/72112/how-to-alter-the-global-broadcast-address-255-255-255-255-behavior-on-windows
>
