Hi, I'm trying to setup virtual mailboxes. My setup: - migrated from Courier, so: separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = yes In doc i have read, thant i need to create separate namespace. namespace { prefix = virtual/ separator = / location virtual:~/Maildir/virtual So i need to change / with . (Dot) in prefix and separator? Do i need to append LAYOUT=maildir++ to location? Where must location point? To the same directory where mail_location? Or do i need to create separate hierarchy for virtual mailboxes? Thanks for any answer ;) Peter ml.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Peter Hodur wrote:> I'm trying to setup virtual mailboxes. My setup: > > - migrated from Courier, so: > > separator = . > prefix = INBOX. > inbox = yes > > > In doc i have read, thant i need to create separate namespace. > > namespace { prefix = virtual/ separator = / location > virtual:~/Maildir/virtual > > So i need to change / with . (Dot) in prefix and separator? > > Do i need to append LAYOUT=maildir++ to location? > > Where must location point? To the same directory where mail_location? Or do > i need to create separate hierarchy for virtual mailboxes?Do you mix virtual users with virtual mailboxes? A virtual mailbox displays messages according some search / selection expressions, hence, there is no layout. - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBWEUZ13z1H7kL/d9rAQKO3wf/VaPNWwPu2cnzTboV6Mj+JFmjDZ9Q4Vqp IgNbLU9XHfb5mEVxoRm9yOJbPdnQqE1o3rh7NRPkP/89uzXQRYzzMIYXV/ozTHo7 DA0KdLm15fri1B+w4DTxa1aX51O/AwNOW8hMgPn0qQC/zsyPVnnmuPh4gn7TTXgH YScYWDftPVoX7MPuKXfo4IYFl6K1PeYy1pi7evFGvhfBVw0HWI+msCvrFSb6c8QE qQ1D91n5u4dO1QK3aZO9JdfEpY1rXMUx79Tx7zxzlKRPo7g2BDRdkfepRj1ke3VN q1/nOLI5jAVQVGAQgVTrCMA8/D5EsX7/ZVd/yieu94Ywznp1xfpo0w==qOpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 12/03/2016 02:19 AM, Peter Hodur wrote:> Hi, > > I'm trying to setup virtual mailboxes. My setup: > > - migrated from Courier, so: > > separator = . > prefix = INBOX. > inbox = yes > > > In doc i have read, thant i need to create separate namespace. > > namespace { prefix = virtual/ separator = / location > virtual:~/Maildir/virtualYes you must create a separate namespace like this : namespace { prefix = Somename. separator = . location = virtual:~/Maildir/virtual type = private list = yes }> > So i need to change / with . (Dot) in prefix and separator?The separator must be the same for ALL namespaces , as the documentation states.> > Do i need to append LAYOUT=maildir++ to location? > > Where must location point? To the same directory where mail_location? Or do > i need to create separate hierarchy for virtual mailboxes?This is tricky . I tried to create a virtual folder namespace for use with a public namespace , but got into file system permission trouble. For Individual users works OK , but you will need to administer it, because it's not manageable from a users perspective (it's complicated). George P.> > Thanks for any answer ;) > > Peter ml.
I didn't see my reply on the list , so I'm fw again direct to you On 12/03/2016 02:19 AM, Peter Hodur wrote:> Hi, > > I'm trying to setup virtual mailboxes. My setup: > > - migrated from Courier, so: > > separator = . > prefix = INBOX. > inbox = yes > > > In doc i have read, thant i need to create separate namespace. > > namespace { prefix = virtual/ separator = / location > virtual:~/Maildir/virtualYes you must create a separate namespace like this : namespace { prefix = Somename. separator = . location = virtual:~/Maildir/virtual type = private list = yes }> > So i need to change / with . (Dot) in prefix and separator?The separator must be the same for ALL namespaces , as the documentation states.> > Do i need to append LAYOUT=maildir++ to location? > > Where must location point? To the same directory where mail_location? Or do > i need to create separate hierarchy for virtual mailboxes?This is tricky . I tried to create a virtual folder namespace for use with a public namespace , but got into file system permission trouble. For Individual users works OK , but you will need to administer it, because it's not manageable from a users perspective (it's complicated). George P.> > Thanks for any answer ;) > > Peter ml.