CentOS - Jan 2018 - C7 Plus Kernel

A new kernel for Centos 7.4.1708 was released several days ago, version
3.10.0-693.17.1. Will there be a matching CentOS Plus kernel?

Thanks for all the effort in providing that.

Also, is there an announce list for Plus updates?

--
I yam Popeye of the Borg. Prepares ta beez askimiligrated.

Albert McCann
albert.mccann at outlook.com

On 28/01/18 19:04, Albert McCann wrote:
> A new kernel for Centos 7.4.1708 was released several days ago, version
3.10.0-693.17.1. Will there be a matching CentOS Plus kernel?
> 
> Thanks for all the effort in providing that.
> 
> Also, is there an announce list for Plus updates?
> 
> --
> I yam Popeye of the Borg. Prepares ta beez askimiligrated.
> 
> Albert McCann
> albert.mccann at outlook.com 
Hi Albert,

We are aware that kernel-plus isn't (yet) available, but it was worked
on today. Akemi (kernel maintainer) provided a modified/patched version
as the previous one was building for x86_64 but not for i386.
Depending on the build/test results it will be pushed soon to mirrors.

Sorry for the delay,

-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20180128/78ec959a/attachment-0001.sig>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Fabian
> Arrotin
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2018 1:21 PM
> To: centos at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] C7 Plus Kernel
> 
> Hi Albert,
> 
> We are aware that kernel-plus isn't (yet) available, but it was worked
> on today. Akemi (kernel maintainer) provided a modified/patched version
> as the previous one was building for x86_64 but not for i386.
> Depending on the build/test results it will be pushed soon to mirrors.
> 
> Sorry for the delay,
Thanks! It's no problem and no rush, just was curious.

--
Virtual Reality? Reality already IS virtual.

Albert McCann
albert.mccann at outlook.com