> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > its been withdrawn upstream. > > given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get > enough attention to the issues and just do a build without needing to > rely on what redhat is doing internally ?Yes, I second that!! -- //Sorin
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote:> > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > > its been withdrawn upstream. > > > > given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get > > enough attention to the issues and just do a build without needing to > > rely on what redhat is doing internally ? > > Yes, I second that!! > > -- > //Sorin >The motion being seconded, I now move the question. (Sorry, Roberts Rules of Order are a fascination of mine.) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
Johnny, Any new information here? On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:10 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:> Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:26 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > >> Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se > > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > -----Original Message----- > >> >> > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] > >> On > >> >> > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > >> >> > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > >> >> > > >> >> > given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get > >> >> > enough attention to the issues and just do a build without needing > >> to > >> >> > rely on what redhat is doing internally ? > >> >> > >> >> Yes, I second that!! > >> >> > >> > The motion being seconded, I now move the question. (Sorry, Roberts > >> > Rulesof Order are a fascination of mine.) > >> > > >> But there's been no discussion.... > >> > >> And CentOS just rebuilds RHEL. There are "extras", but I don't know if > >> those are CentOS-specific. > >> > >> mark, has played parliamentarian > > > > Sorry, no discussion. The question has been moved. :) (I kid...) > > Yes, you moved, but there was no second to calling the question..... > <snip> > mark "best use of Robert's Rules: to shut up someone who will > go on and on and on...." > > >-- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>:> Any new information here?maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... -- LF