search for: callaway

On 02/03/2016 09:52 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Are you trying to build R and components for i686 rather than x86_64? Never mind. Your logs make it clear that you're building for x86_64. Can you share the output of: pkg-config --list-all |grep libcurl curl-config --libs rpm -V libcurl-devel libcurl I'm honestly baffled a...

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: >> >> http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ >> >> I did this: >> >> sudo subscriptio...

...n. Let me know if you spot something of concern. Hopefully I am good to go now. Thanks for the assist, Larry -----Original Message----- From: R-SIG-Fedora [mailto:r-sig-fedora-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:06 AM To: 'Tom Callaway' <tcallawa at redhat.com>; 'r-sig-fedora at r-project.org' <r-sig-fedora at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages I used epel to install again. I removed the original installation that seemed from epel also. [root at ping /]# pkg-config --l...

Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... -- LF

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links >> are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. >&g...

...; wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora community >> would help to share the effort. >> >> Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo >> >> > Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and libs. as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the organizational layer and less on the technical one. -- LF

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora > > R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). > With > > the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and > > R-rtracklayer, I beli...

...very much for all your help. I guess I'll file a bug in the CentOS Bug Tracker so that the nouveau driver might get fixed. I'll also post to R-help so someone with the same problem who only searches R-help and not this SIG will see the solution. -Ben -----Original Message----- From: Tom Callaway [mailto:tcallawa at redhat.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:10 PM To: Wittner, Ben, Ph.D.; r-sig-fedora at r-project.org Cc: Duncan Murdoch Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rgl.snapshot only captures a small portion what's visible in the RGL device window on CentOS 7 I have not tried it perso...

...to the mount command. Hope it helps. I?aki > > Issue aside, may I ask what is the purpose of putting the library in a > smb share? May I suggest [1]? > > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/#additional-packages > > I?aki > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:48, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The log of you running configure on your instance allows me to compare it to the log of when we build it as a package (you don't need to provide that one). > > > > Honestly, I have no idea right now _why_ pre-built R would fail...

Hi, I am totally new to Linux and trying to install R and related tools. I downloaded the rpm files for el4/x86_64 from the CRAN repository and tried to run rpm but it did not go through complaining about dependencies. Do all the listed rpm files need to be installed? What is the order in which these need to be installed? I appreciate any help with this or any suggestions for alternate ways

...: R(ABI) = 4 ? I don't suppose we need it, since the likelihood of someone installing R module packages but not updating R is low, but I wanted to throw it out there. Tom On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:31 PM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 19:15, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break in > compatibility > > for R packages. From the NEWS entry for 4.0.0: > > > > Packages need to be (re-)installed under this versi...

Okay, I'm convinced. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/R-rpm-macros/pull/1 Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:48 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 16:29, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hmmm. That seems like a rather heavy dependency, given that I think we've > > only been forced to do rebuilds for everything as a result of 4.0.0 and > > 3.4.0. > > That's just coincidence, because if you browse old...

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

Maybe Elliott? On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote...

...ide, may I ask what is the purpose of putting the library in a >> > smb share? May I suggest [1]? >> > >> > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/#additional-packages >> > >> > I?aki >> > >> > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:48, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > The log of you running configure on your instance allows me to compare it to the log of when we build it as a package (you don't need to provide that one). >> > > >> > > Honestly, I have no idea rig...

Full_Name: Tom Callaway Version: 2.7.2 OS: Fedora 10 (Linux/x86_64) Submission from: (NULL) (96.233.67.230) Recently, Debian identified a security issue with the javareconf script in R. I confirmed that this is still unfixed in R 2.7.2. The following patch resolves the issue: diff -up R-2.7.2/src/scripts/javareconf.BA...

...s something only the > Fedora texlive packager has mis-understood. Texlive packages don't require anything at build time, so Andreas has nothing to do with this issue. The description of his package claims that R and knitr are required at run time, so the Fedora packager (Tom 'spot' Callaway, in CC now) had to take a decision: either to avoid non-texlive dependencies, which results in a broken installation (texlive-includernw won't work without R), or to be more user-friendly and install all the required run time dependencies. Tom took the second path, as he did too with texlive-g...

...of putting the library in a > >> > smb share? May I suggest [1]? > >> > > >> > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/#additional-packages > >> > > >> > I?aki > >> > > >> > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:48, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > The log of you running configure on your instance allows me to > compare it to the log of when we build it as a package (you don't need to > provide that one). > >> > > > >> > &gt...

...ult of 4.0.0 and 3.4.0. Does anyone know if upstream has any sort of commitment to ABI here that we could depend on (e.g. only breaking on major versions, never minor) ? Tom On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 5:32 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 05:46, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Thinking out loud here... do we want to have some macro magic to embed a > > dependency on an R(ABI) provides? Where R 4.0.0 would provide R(ABI) = 4 > > and all R packages built against it would pick up Requires: R(ABI) = 4 ? &g...

...m 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" < > mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu > >>> : > >>> Any new information here? > >> > >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora community > >> would help to share the effort. > >> > >> Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo > >> > >> > > Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and > libs. > > > as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the > organizational layer and less on the technical one. > > --...