On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:47:47 -0400
Farhan Ali <alifm at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/21/2018 09:28 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > Anyway I'm fine with swapping the old out and your new version in,
> > if you prefer it that way.
> >
> > If you do, would you like to have a respin?
Just send me a respin with something that you find useful :) (maybe a
mashup of our descriptions) (while at it, you could also add the
cc:stable, which I agree make sense)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Halil
> >
>
> I had been looking into this code recently, and shouldn't
vcdev->status
> (function get/set_status functions) also have a lock around it? Or is it
> not possible to have a race condition on vcdev->status?
I don't think so, as status is only a byte.
>
> Thanks
> Farhan
>
>
> >>>
> >>> Let us protect the shared state using vcdev->lock.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> >
>
