Dan Cropp
2017-Dec-13 17:51 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system?
Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip performing similar work. For PJSIP... I currently have an endpoint configured to a system using IP based authentication. It is configured with a match setting in the endpoint section. All channels coming from that IP address go to this endpoint. They want me to keep this endpoint, but add a new endpoint where we register with them. Existing... [transport1] type = transport bind = 0.0.0.0 protocol = udp [1002] type = aor remove_existing = yes contact = sip:1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx [1002] type = endpoint context = mycontext transport = transport1 accountcode = 6 dtmf_mode = inband device_state_busy_at = 48 force_rport = no identify_by = username from_user = 1002 disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 [identify112] type = identify endpoint = 1002 match = 1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx I setup the registration and the endpoint. [286] type = aor remove_existing = yes contact = sip:286 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx qualify_frequency = 60 [auth8] type = auth username = 286 password = yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy [286] type = endpoint context = mycontext transport = transport1 outbound_auth = auth8 aors = 286 accountcode = 22 dtmf_mode = inband device_state_busy_at = 48 force_rport = no disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 [registration3] type = registration transport = transport1 client_uri = sip:286 at zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz server_uri = sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx contact_user = 286 outbound_auth = auth8 expiration = 3600 The registration for the second endpoint works fine. However, when I call through the other system for 286, it is failing. For the INVITE from the other switch, the from_user varies depending on who is calling. Asterisk logs report "No matching endpoint found" when it processes the INVITE for 286. I believe the reason INVITEs work for the other channel is because they are programmed to support the match for this IP address. Can anyone offer some suggestions? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171213/af0e3343/attachment.html>
George Joseph
2017-Dec-14 16:59 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote:> Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the > existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip > performing similar work. > > > > For PJSIP? > > I currently have an endpoint configured to a system using IP based > authentication. It is configured with a match setting in the endpoint > section. > > All channels coming from that IP address go to this endpoint. > > > > They want me to keep this endpoint, but add a new endpoint where we > register with them. > > > > Existing? > > [transport1] > > type = transport > > bind = 0.0.0.0 > > protocol = udp > > > > [1002] > > type = aor > > remove_existing = yes > > contact = sip:1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > > [1002] > > type = endpoint > > context = mycontext > > transport = transport1 > > accountcode = 6 > > dtmf_mode = inband > > device_state_busy_at = 48 > > force_rport = no > > identify_by = username > > from_user = 1002 > > disallow = all > > allow = ulaw > > acl = acl1 > > > > [identify112] > > type = identify > > endpoint = 1002 > > match = 1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx >Check this first... identify112 probably failed to load because the match parameter can only take an ip address plus an optional netmask, or a hostname. The '1002@' is invalid.> > > I setup the registration and the endpoint. > > > > [286] > > type = aor > > remove_existing = yes > > contact = sip:286 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > qualify_frequency = 60 > > > > [auth8] > > type = auth > > username = 286 > > password = yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy > > > > [286] > > type = endpoint > > context = mycontext > > transport = transport1 > > outbound_auth = auth8 > > aors = 286 > > accountcode = 22 > > dtmf_mode = inband > > device_state_busy_at = 48 > > force_rport = no > > disallow = all > > allow = ulaw > > acl = acl1 > > > > [registration3] > > type = registration > > transport = transport1 > > client_uri = sip:286 at zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz > > server_uri = sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > contact_user = 286 > > outbound_auth = auth8 > > expiration = 3600 > > > > The registration for the second endpoint works fine. However, when I call > through the other system for 286, it is failing. For the INVITE from the > other switch, the from_user varies depending on who is calling. Asterisk > logs report ?No matching endpoint found? when it processes the INVITE for > 286. > > > > I believe the reason INVITEs work for the other channel is because they > are programmed to support the match for this IP address. > > > > Can anyone offer some suggestions? >You may be able to use the 'line and 'endpoint' registration parameters... [registration3] type = registration ... line = yes endpoint = 286 This causes asterisk to put the encoded endpoint name in the outgoing Contact header. If the provider properly echos back Contact parameters when sending responses or new requests, asterisk will use the line parameter to match an endpoint. I'll have to double check but I believe we do that BEFORE checking any identify object for a match.> > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk. > org/ > > New to Asterisk? Start here: > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >-- George Joseph Digium, Inc. | Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171214/7877b291/attachment.html>
Dan Cropp
2017-Dec-18 16:04 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system?
Thanks George I originally didn?t have the 1002@ for the identify. Changed that when things were not working. I changed it back. Unfortunately, the system I am connecting with doesn?t seem to support the line support. Looking at the SIP packets, I see Asterisk send it. Unfortunately, they do not send the line information as part of the INVITE. I checked with some developers of that system and they do not know anything about the line setting. Is there any rfcs I could refer them to? From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of George Joseph Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system? On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com<mailto:dan at amtelco.com>> wrote: Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip performing similar work. For PJSIP? I currently have an endpoint configured to a system using IP based authentication. It is configured with a match setting in the endpoint section. All channels coming from that IP address go to this endpoint. They want me to keep this endpoint, but add a new endpoint where we register with them. Existing? [transport1] type = transport bind = 0.0.0.0 protocol = udp [1002] type = aor remove_existing = yes contact = sip:1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx [1002] type = endpoint context = mycontext transport = transport1 accountcode = 6 dtmf_mode = inband device_state_busy_at = 48 force_rport = no identify_by = username from_user = 1002 disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 [identify112] type = identify endpoint = 1002 match = 1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<mailto:1002 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx> Check this first... identify112 probably failed to load because the match parameter can only take an ip address plus an optional netmask, or a hostname. The '1002@' is invalid. I setup the registration and the endpoint. [286] type = aor remove_existing = yes contact = sip:286 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx qualify_frequency = 60 [auth8] type = auth username = 286 password = yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy [286] type = endpoint context = mycontext transport = transport1 outbound_auth = auth8 aors = 286 accountcode = 22 dtmf_mode = inband device_state_busy_at = 48 force_rport = no disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 [registration3] type = registration transport = transport1 client_uri = sip:286 at zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz server_uri = sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx contact_user = 286 outbound_auth = auth8 expiration = 3600 The registration for the second endpoint works fine. However, when I call through the other system for 286, it is failing. For the INVITE from the other switch, the from_user varies depending on who is calling. Asterisk logs report ?No matching endpoint found? when it processes the INVITE for 286. I believe the reason INVITEs work for the other channel is because they are programmed to support the match for this IP address. Can anyone offer some suggestions? You may be able to use the 'line and 'endpoint' registration parameters... [registration3] type = registration ... line = yes endpoint = 286 This causes asterisk to put the encoded endpoint name in the outgoing Contact header. If the provider properly echos back Contact parameters when sending responses or new requests, asterisk will use the line parameter to match an endpoint. I'll have to double check but I believe we do that BEFORE checking any identify object for a match. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- George Joseph Digium, Inc. | Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com<http://www.digium.com/> & www.asterisk.org<http://www.asterisk.org/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171218/04bded11/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system?
- Is it possible to have two endpoints to the same IP address where one uses IP based authentication and the other requires asterisk to register to that system?
- Question on pjsip.conf and aors
- PJSIP Endpoint AOR question
- PJSIP Endpoint AOR question